A Dictionary of the Sovereign People-
The Law. The People.. Their Sovereignty… Their Rights…. Their Land….. Their GOVERNMENT and ITS PROPERTY……
Table of Contents-
Chapter 1…………………………………………The Law
Chapter 2………………………………….We the People
Chapter 3………………………………Their Sovereignty
Chapter 4…………………………….The People’s Rights
Chapter 5………………………………The People’s Land
Chapter 6…………..Their GOVERNMENT and it’s PROPERTY
Page 1 of 95
The Law. The People.. Their Sovereignty… Their Rights…. Their Land….. Their GOVERNMENT and ITS PROPERTY……
“My People are destroyed for lack of Knowledge: because Thou hast refused Knowledge, I will also Refuse Thee that Thou shalt be no Priest to Me: and seeing Thou hast forgotten the Law of Thy God, I will also forget Thy Children.” Geneva 1599. A corrupt system finds its security in the ignorance of the People; Publius
A Treatise on, and Repository for the Principals of the Natural Law taken from The Constitution and Laws of The United States of America and, Their Specific Application to the People as Citizens of the Several States of This American Union With References to the Common and Natural Law of America and Its European Founders. by Publius
In the Common Law Republic of California; Established (1849) Created according to Prerogative Right, The American Common Law, and Sovereign Duty for the Education of the Posterity of the Founding Fathers (Federalists), Nunc Pro Tunc from the Year One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy Six (1776).
Prelude
This Writing, is in a Dictionary format, and is in the best “Kings English”, and is based on the Principles and Wording taken from “Blackstone’s Commentaries” Ch 7 “The Kings Prerogatives” (1753); The “Federalists Papers” (1788) (Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 61–10757); as well as Many Never overturned Supreme Court rulings,
Page 2 of 95
such as Chisholm vs. Georgia 2 Dall 419 (1793); Lansing vs. Smith 4 Wendell 9,20 (1829); Dred Scott vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393 (1856); Hennessy vs. Richardson 189 U.S. 25 (1902); also Noah Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language (1828); Bouvier’s Law Dictionaries’ (1840/56/1914) and The Many other Sources of Our Liberties, to name a Few.
Intent
This is not an attempt at ethnic cleansing; and must not be viewed as racially motivated, but is a path for all People to see the truth within themselves. That being said, The Purpose and Intent of this Dictionary is to perpetuate the Law of God on Earth, in The United States of America. And by this Principal, to expose and correct the Many ERRORS, deviations from the Truth, that have been committed by those so-called educated INDIVIDUALS, and their MISS USE of “words”, their “confounded definitions”, there fraudulent applications, and the erroneous “CAPITALIZATION” of most of the technical Words that are now compiled in the many Volumes of LEGAL and Lawful writings that fill the Law Libraries of each and every County in these Federal States. The words that I shall identify, have now become a Source of deception and fraudulent guide for the average “person” leading to the total IGNORANCE of the People, European descendants of these United States in America and an unlimited source of $ numbers for a Constitutionally Prohibited FOREIGN Central “BANC”.
Rules of Engagement and Their Application
This Writing is not laid out in Alphabetical order, but instead, is in consequence of the evolution of Our Federal System in Time by chronological Date from at least Magna Charta, 1215 (Act of defiance by Europeans in Europe) through the Revolution (1776)/revolt of the descendants of Europeans in America, up to its impending demise….
Page 3 of 95
I must first set the Rules that must be Adhered to in order that the Reader might catch a Clear and True Understanding of the Proper use, Meaning and Application of each Word as they are Confined to Our Federal System in The United States of America… and their applicability and Intent when applied to [T]he People as defined herein:
Rule Number 1: Noah Webster Authored and compiled the Best known available English Language Dictionary defining the “words” of the English Language in a very broad general sense from at least Magna Charta (1215), to (1828). Although not created in the best “Kings English”, It is still in print in the United States of America, and is preceded only by the Federalists Papers and the Supreme Court decisions on each technical Subject. Note: that whether by mistake, ignorance or criminal intent, none of the Case Law or reprints are done in the Best Kings English. For the best Example of the “Kings English”, See the Original Script Constitution of the United States of America (1788); or, see Public Law 91–589; 92 Congress 2 Session Senate Document No 92–82, US Printing Office Stock Number 5271–00308 Dated (1972) for a “Literal Print” Copy of the Original Script in type;
Rule Number 2: At the Revolution (1776) Each one of The People, who was a subject of the Crown in Europe, became, by Natural Law, “A Sovereign and Citizen of the State” in America, in consequence of His or Her “Demain Domicile”;
Rule Number 3: At the Revolution (1776) The 13 feudal colonies in America, held by the Crown of Europe, became, by force of Law, “Allodial” Independent Sovereign States”;
Rule Number 4: At the Revolution (1776) The total Sovereignty impregnated in the person of the Crown of Europe over the 13 feudal colonies in America, was transferred and grafted, by force of natural Law,
Page 4 of 95
into the “Citizens of the State” and Their Posterity, Who, in that moment of Revolt, became a Law unto Themselves, unique as to all the other Sovereign Nations’ in this World;
Rule Number 5: At the Revolution (1776) The Private Prerogatives of the Crown’s of Europe, and all the Political Power exercised by them over the 13 feudal colonies and their subjects, evolved, by natural Law, into the “Citizen of the State”;
Rule Number 6: At the Revolution (1776) all the Crown Land of the Original 13 Colonies in America, became Independent Sovereign States, and the exclusive Allodial Property of the new Sovereign People, now equal to all other Sovereign Nations of the World. And all future Land, Claimed or Purchased under authority of these People, after qualifying under Article IV with a “Republican form of Government, and becoming a State on an equal footing with the Original 13 States of the American Union, were, from that moment, and Forever, subject to the “Private Allodial/Domain” Claims, when made by one of the People, Descendants of “Europeans and a “Citizen of That State as one of the Several States of the American Union”;
Rule Number 7: The Federalists Papers are the Final Word on the Interpretation, Intent, and Application of the Original Constitution; and when a Question arises about the Strict Meaning of any Word in It, or the Law applicable to it, reference must be made to Rule Number 1. Publius
Chapter 1…………………………….The Law
The Law
Page 5 of 95
This writing is based on the Principals of “[T]he” American Common Law and Truth
July 4 1776, When the Founding Fathers revolted and Shook off theFEARS of self responsibility, and the chains of subjugation on the continent of America, They planted the seed of Individual Sovereign Liberty Here. Once that Seed was Planted, the Fruit of that Seed Produced a Federal Union of Individual Sovereigns. That Federal Union was a “People” descended from the European blood line. Governed by, what they called “The Common Law of England” that was birthed at the signing of Magna Charta (1215). That Seed took 561 years to grow into a Sovereignty Of, By, and For the “White European People”. This “Common Law” is a Creation of God, that operates Equally upon All of God’s Creatures. It certainly follows that the common law of retribution, Cause and Effect applies to everyone. The following quotes are just a few examples; (1) You Treat your fellow Man/and Woman as you want them to treat You; (2) You Do unto others as You want them to do unto You; (3) What you do to the least of mine, You do to Me (God the Creator); (4) You reap what you sew; An eye for an eye; (5) A pound of flesh for a pound of flesh; But, vengeance is in the hand of God. These are just a few of the Common Laws that the Founding Fathers used in the Creation of this Nation.
If you are blessed with the gift of being a wise council and godlike example for People, and you use this gift for self enrichment, personal power to inflict your will over other people, you are violating one or more of the Common Laws, and will reap the consequences of God’s American Common Law.
This Common Law, as distinguished from “statutory, equitable, or civil law”, is the foundation upon which the State of California was Founded, and is the Law in all the Courts of this State See California Statute 95, April 13, 1850; REPORT ON CIVIL AND COMMON LAW; Establishing, in place of The CIVIL LAW, the “American Common Law”
Page 6 of 95
@ page 604; and confirmed in CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE § 22.2 (1986); AND, Blacks 5th Law Dictionary (1979) p. 251; and Emma Rojo v. Kliger 265 Cal. Rptr. 130, 52 Cal. 3rd 65 (1990); Fenn v. Holm 62 U.S. (21 How.) 481(1858)
It’s the nature of “Words” to cause the human mind to identify with pictures. It has been said, that one picture is worth a thousand words. Different strict words, in their acceptation, are generally used to create different strict pictures. Therefore, when two different words are used in their strict meaning to identify two strictly different pictures, the mind automatically sees two strictly different pictures. This principal is sound and maintains the Picture of Truth. As was in the minds of the Founding Fathers, when they used the word “Citizen”, it was associated with only [O]ne, of the 13 States, not All of the 13 States. They were “Citizens of a State, Not a “citizen of the UNITED STATES”!
But what if during a long chain of writings, someone vested with authority were to replace the Proper Noun word “Citizen”, as it was Capitalized and written in the Original Text of the Script Constitution of the United States of America, with the common noun/word “citizen” as used throughout the rest of the world? The Original Proper Noun “Citizen” is the first Principal of Our American Common Law that describes [T]hat specific Member of the specific Class of Uncommon European descended People known individually as a “Citizen” of a State of the collective United States of America, As written in Article IV §2, Original Constitution of the United States of America (1788); “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities as Citizens in the several States.”
Thus was the case by Thomas Jefferson in the 1st Naturalization Law (1790). Not only is the word ‘citizen’ not properly capitalized, but also makes reference to the United States, a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Page 7 of 95
[DC] not yet created (1795). If you place the word “White” next to one of the qualifications for citizenship, there is now a very distinct difference between this “Citizen” and all the other “citizens” before the Revolution of 1776. They are what the Supreme Court has generally called the “Sovereign People”, Synonymous with “We The People”, and “Citizen of the State”. This application of the word ‘Citizen” properly capitalized is now an exclusive picture of a White Citizen of European decent Domiciled in one of the Several Federal States in America; and is now a “Proper Noun” and properly Capitalized when and wherever the government needs to identify this exclusive Sovereign Status. Refer to the Case of United Mine Workers 330 U.S. 258 footnote 23/24 (1947). No other word like person, individual, resident, taxpayer, can be used in any law to have any lawful application to the Private Person or Property of a “White Citizen of the State”
But, through many erroneous acts, Legislative Executive and Judicial, this Proper Noun “Citizen” has regressed back in time when it described only a “subject of the Crown”. Thus begins the creation and infusion of a “NEGATIVE POWER SYSTEM”. Such a system, like a “DEMOCRACY”, is now used by the TRATORUS, TREASONEOUS elected trustees to empower themselves through the influx of A MAJORITY of aliens and their want for a free lunch. Thus the extermination of the White Citizen of the State replaced by alien denizens of the Municipal Corporation of the District of Colombia aka ‘THE UNITED STATES’; and in this new age of enlightened ignorance is found a growing element called by the GOVERNMENT as, the “Sovereign People”. This new class of People is hard on the minds of the present system. The System is trying to discover a cure for this new found ailment that now threatens its DEMOCRATIC COMMUNIST MONARCHY. But it will be discovered, like the Revolution (1776) that tyranny at any level or degree will at some point be exterminated, and the People will reappear as before and start anew as the Posterity of We the People, in this Republican form of Government.
Page 8 of 95
These false tools, as used by the confounded teachings of the present democratic government controlled education system, teaches the use of common words that have uncommon meanings in Our Federal System. This creates a false picture. As previously explained, when the Word “Citizen” is used in the Constitution with a Capitol “C”, it is describing a “White European Sovereign Citizen of one of the Several States in His Sovereign Person, with Unalienable Rights; on the other hand when the word “citizen” is lower case, it describes a common person, although appearing to have an elevated status, but is now nothing more than a subject of the District of Columbia, not a State, having only CIVIL RIGHTS and “Banc CHATTEL” This is for the strict benefit of the CIVIL CODE system, not the Sovereign People. The Posterity, and their senses, have not yet properly developed according to Gods Law, but have instead, become jaded and destructive to themselves and their neighbors. The present code system has hidden the access to the strict pictures of the Law, blinding the Posterity from discerning the difference between Right and Wrong, or Unalienable Secured Rights as opposed to CIVIL GUARANTEED RIGHTS
The word ‘Law’, hereafter defined, emanates from ‘God’ and can be seen through mans actions, either through His Heart, or His MIND.
When His Heart is right, His actions are seen as ‘God Like’, and the effects are of ‘Love’, or simply ‘Positive’.
When the ‘Law of God’ is defused through His MIND by ‘ego,‘lust’, ‘anger’, greed’, attachment, or ‘vanity’, His Heart becomes grieved, and the effects are simply NEGATIVE.
It is the Sovereign Nature and Power of God to instruct Man through the operation of the Law of cause and effect. This Law is the Grand Design and the Rule from God showing exactly how Man and Woman are to listen, not through the senses, but from inside Their Person, and to Therein discover the Domicile in him of the Law of God, and learn to Act from the Word of God, or, to gain enlightenment, or suffer as the case may be, the consequences for not hearing.
Page 9 of 95
The word ‘LEGAL’, is a creation of Man and is not synonymous or equal to the word “Lawful”. It is simply a jaded or confounded picture of the Law. It is used to convince Man to follow a CODE, or MANS rules that use words taught by the system that are of common use but that define acts or things that subject the People by their ignorance, to a regulatable CODE, which when not complied with, causes fines, fees, and criminal/COMMIRCIAL punishment. The code regulations are used to identify strict acts of a commercial nature but that also identify the Prerogative Unalienable Rights of the Posterity. These catch “words” are in every code, STATE AND FEDERAL. [See list in box of Chapter 6, Their GOVERNMENT]
When Mans RULE as written, does not acknowledge Gods Law, or fails to identify the Path to Gods Law, it is a WRONG, or simply an incomplete LEGAL RULE.
The rules of MAN, with the exception of The Constitution(1788), have always been identified as, a ‘CODE’; but, there is a Lawful Statute upon the Books of the California Republic that was later codified as THE CALIFORNIA MOTOR VEHICLE CODE, that not only identifies the LEGAL licensable activity and the license FEE associated therewith, but, this Statute also shows and distinguishes that LEGAL licensable COMMERCIAL activity from the Constitutionally Secured Lawfuly Exempted Prerogative Unalienable Right of Liberty secured to the Posterity under Gods Law. AND THE REVOLT (1776) The following is an actual quote taken from that Statute, but unfortunately, like most other statutes, fails to cite its specific Constitutional Authority:
Ch. 412] FORTY-SIXTH SESSION 833
Page 10 of 95
“An act to impose a license fee for the transportation of persons or property for hire or compensation upon public streets, roads and highways in the State of California by motor vehicles; to provide for certain exemptions; to provide for the enforcement of the provisions hereof and for the disposition of the amounts collected on account of such licenses; to make an appropriation for the purpose of this act; and to repeal all acts or parts of acts in conflict herewith.
[Approved by the Governor May 23, 1925.]
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. The words and phrases used in this act shall for the purpose of this act, unless the same be contrary to or inconsistent with the context, be construed as follows:
(b) The word “operator” shall include all persons, firms, associations and corporations who operate motor vehicles upon any public highway in this state and thereby engage in the transportation of persons or property for hire or compensation, but shall not include any person, firm, association or corporation who solely transports by motor vehicle persons to and from or to and from attendance upon any public school or who solely transports his or its own property, or employees, or both, and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation, but all persons operating freight carrying vehicles so exempted shall be required to obtain from the state board of equalization and to display exempt emblems in the manner hereinafter provided.” bold added for emphasis.
This Act further states that the exempt plate shall be obtained from the California Board of Equalization without fee or charge………….!!
Page 11 of 95
To see the intent of the authors of The phrase “MOTOR VEHICLE”, and “USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES”, they are STRICTLY defined in THE UNITED STATES CRIMINAL CODE TITLE 18 CHAPTER 2, AIRCRAFT AND MOTOR VEHICLES; § 31; AS DEFINITIONS; and states as follows:
“(a) Definitions. — In this chapter, the following definitions apply:
(1) Aircraft.
(6) Motor vehicle. — The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
(10) Used for commercial purposes. — The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit…….”
This is a COMMERCIAL CODE applicable to anything or anyone that chooses to violate the “American Common Law”, in place of the REGULATABLE, TAXABLE, LICENSABLE, FINABLE, FEE LADEN MANMADE CODES AND REGULATIONS for effecting OR contracting with the Public At Large.
Law = God = The People/Posterity = Unalienable Rights = Sovereignty of the White Citizen of the State = The American Common Law = The Constitution = Trust = Government Trustees = Statutes Under the Law to protect and defend the Sovereignty, their Prerogative Rights, and the Private Property of the People, and their Posterity;
Page 12 of 95
Following an act of the legislature, once that Authority from the Constitution of cited, the Statute under the Law is created and a code may follow. This “CODE” is then LEGAL by way of the execution of the = POLICE POWERS which mandates= LICENSE = PERMISSION to engage the Public for PROFIT OR GAIN = COMMERCE effecting the Public = CODES, RULES, REGULATIONS = CONTRACT with the Public = Violations of the Public Trust and or the COMMERCIAL and CRIMINAL CODES, RULES, REGULATIONS = COMMERCIAL, CRIMINAL which are all LEGAL COMMERCIAL CRIMES. This system derives its security from the IGNORANCE of the Posterity, and each of Them. Publius
Man, out of ignorance and fear, has chosen to be trapped under a LEGAL SYSTEM distinguished from the American Common Law, created for the strict protection of his Unalienable Rights. This protection is found in the enactment and enforcement by the “POLICE POWERS”, under authority of the commercial codes rules and regulations that apply specifically to the specific activities of an ‘ARTIFICIAL’ nature, that is ‘COMMERCIAL’; where a person engages the Public in a licensable taxable profitable act, that the Founding Fathers placed under the strict guidance AND control of those most learned of the People by and through the Constitutionally created Trustees of the American Common Law GOVERNMENT, the Posterity is left to discover the key to the exit of this CODE system.
Back to “The Law”:
“Law”; According to Noah Webster 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language (hereafter referenced as NW28), there are at least 30 different notations on “Law”, none of which specifically identify the “Law” emanating from the creation of the “United States of America” by its “European decended People”. This “Law” could be, and should be the “ Law of God ” on Earth. The closest NW28 comes to this “Law” is called,
Page 13 of 95
in number 8. Moral law, a law which prescribes to men their religious and social duties, in other words, their duties to God and each other. …delivered to Moses on mount Sinai. Ex. xx.”
At the Revolution of (1776) the European People of the Union of States in American, became Sovereign under God. And by this Act, became a “Law” unto Themselves. This Law is Common to the People on Earth, Not just Europeans, but to all Classes and Faiths. And therefore falls under the definition of the Common Law of Nature. The Law of Nature is The Righteous Law which God, the Sovereign of the Universe, has prescribed to All Men and Women, not by any formal promulgation, but by the internal Dictate of Consequence alone. It is discovered by each of Us from its affects upon Ourselves, and that of other Humans and nature, resulting from Our Individual and or collective acts culminating from such causes, which are the plague and nature of Man and Woman on Earth. The Righteous Law is not amendable or subject to any complaint or dictate of Man. It treats of the divine Rights of the People as well as that of the kings. It works both ways equally so that neither can escape the effect of a trespass upon the Other’s Rights. The negative Cause creates a negative consequence. To have to write the Law upon the Books and use this as a guide to keep society Right with the Moral standards of Life is a futile attempt to halt the disorder in a society. As the Human race enters upon its decline in civilized standards there is, and was, a transfer of the Righteous Law from Man to Constitutions, ENACTED STATUTES and CIVIL&CRIMINAL CODES, in other words, from Moral Standards deeply embedded in the inner Consciousness of The People, to LAWS and RULES written in BOOKS. When the time came that the Law of Righteousness was no longer in the Hearts of the People, but in their enacted BOOKS, then the decline of the union of Righteous Men began. Consequently it comprehends all the Duties and Payments which Man, by His ignorance, owes either to God, to Himself, or to His Neighbors; such as Reverence to God, Temperance, Honor to Our Parents, Benevolence to All, a strict Adherence to Our Engagements, Gratitude, Punctuality,
Page 14 of 95
Patience, and a strict Discipline to the Act of “Unconditional Love”. Publius
The “Constitution of The United States of America” (1788), is the Rule of Law of The White European People, and was an attempt to Create a Higher Physical Environment far removed from the European monarchies of chaos and subjugation, for the express purpose to help Awaken this “Moral Righteous Law” in the Hearts of Its People, and an example to the world.
The “ Several States of America ”; Is The perpetual Blood line of a Group of ”Individual, Federal, Sovereign, Citizens of European decent”, United to form the Repository for the Key to the Door of the Laws of Enlightenment on this Physical World. Although founded out of Revolt to Secure the Principals of Liberty, This is The One Nation under God on Earth where a common Man, or Woman, if He/She knows the Rules of Law, can Exercise that God given Unalienable Right to consciously take part in the creation of His/Her Own Destiny. This is a prelude to a higher State of Consciousness, as well as partaking of the privilege of Sovereignty Secured by God to the People in This Nation. Publius Refer to Articles I through X of Amendment Constitution of the United States of America 1791;
“The United States of America”, (In the Best Kings English) From the Revolution of 1776, up to and including the Ratification of the Constitution on June 21, 1788, and just prior to the Establishment of The Seat of NATIONAL and Federal Jurisdiction on July 16, 1790 known as the “DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”, a “MUNICIPAL CORPORATION”, the Phrase “United States”, had but One and only One, 1, meaning, that being, it described “The 13 Independent Sovereign States, United under God, by the mutual collective Prerogative act of the European Male Sovereign State Militia/Citizens. The People, in Their Person, as Individual Sovereigns, United for Their Mutual Benefit and the Ultimate
Page 15 of 95
Protection and Security extending over All the Federal States for Themselves and Their “Posterity”. These People were All Of European Decent. Publius; see the US Supreme Courts confirmation in Dred Scott vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393 (1858).
On June 21, 1788, following a great deal of debate and the publishing of the “Federalist Papers”, the Ninth State of New Hampshire caused the “Divinely Inspired” “Constitution of the United States of America”, The People’s Law, to become the Federal Law of The Land in every Republic State of the Union, including a not yet established municipal corporation called D.C. ………….at least Two major unforeseen “flaws”, NOT ERRORS, remain in that document;
The 1st Flaw, unforeseen by the Founders, has allowed the Constitution, to be altered in such a way as to open the gate of freedom to a Constitutionally prohibited ENEMY, the “BANC”, well known to the Founding Fathers, AND, to nullify the value of the Peoples Labour. The Lock that secured this gate was Article I, Section 10, Clause 1. “No State shall….. make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;” The hole, left unplugged;, was A YET TO BE FORMED MUNICIPAL CORPORATION called “THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”. Although DC maintained a gold and silver standard, IT nullified its example in 1871, after a “CIVIL WAR”, by way of FORTY-FIRST CONGRESS SESS. III CH 62. SEC. 18, as there was no constitutional prohibition against BANCING, or the circulation of BANC PAPER in D.C.. The BANC faction, through Hamilton, soon implanted its foreign jurisdiction within this Nation. See Mc Culloch vs. Maryland 17 U.S. 316 (1819); And by the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT of 1913, and the ignorance of Ron Paul in a senate hearing with Bernanke, this FRAUD has extended its infectious tentacles, through fraudulent contracts, void licensing, and foreign commercial powers over the The Posterity, and throughout the several Sovereign States of this American Union.
….. This foreign enemy BANC, by way of its morally DEGENERATED BUSINESS PRACTICES of MORTGAGING THE
Page 16 of 95
People, HJR 192, and circulating ITS non-redeemable PAPER as “LEGAL TENDER”, has assumed, through the greed and ignorance of “The Posterity”, total control over the Posterity, Their Private Property, Their Gold and Silver Coin, Their Labour, and the total alienation of Their Sovereignty and Their Federal and State Constitutions; BUT ITS FIXABLE
The 2nd and probably most damaging flaw , not ERROR, was the failure of Madison, and the following Supreme Courts to emphatically, and in strict words, Explain and Show in Plain English, the True Intent and True meaning and True Definition of the word “Amendment” as it was written by the Founding Fathers in Article V of the Constitution;
First I must quote Madison from the Federalist Papers in which He States:
- ``To provide for Amendments to be ratified by three fourths of the States under two exceptions only. ‘’That useful alterations _will be suggested by experience, could not but be foreseen. It was requisite, therefore, that a mode for introducing them should be provided. The mode preferred by the convention seems to be stamped with every mark of propriety. It guards equally against that extreme facility, which would render the Constitution too mutable; and that extreme difficulty, which might perpetuate its discovered faults. It, moreover, equally enables the general and the State governments to originate the _amendment of errors, as they may be pointed out by the experience on one side, or on the other.” Madison №43, Federalist Papers page 278; Emphasis added;
So what error has been pointed out????
“Amend”, “Amendment”_ NW28. v.t. To correct; to rectify by expunging a mistake; as to amend a law. v.i. It differs from improve, in
Page 17 of 95
this, that to amend implies something previously wrong, to improve does not….3. In Law, the correction of an error in a writ or process.”
If the word “Amendments” was all that Madison intended, he would not have added the word “Error” in the Federalists Papers;
“Error” n. A wandering or deviation from the truth. NW28; A “Writ of Error” is a writ of Right; Bouviers’1914,vol I p. 210; This Writ was displaced in our Law by SIXTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS SESS. II CH.229 SEC.237 & 238 (1925). Also see 359 US 437,448–459;
Was the Constitution, or any part of it a Lie??? I think Absolutely Not!!! Publius
The Revolution of 1776, and many of The Supreme Courts rulings deciding “Errors”, such as in Chisholm v. Georgia 2 Dall 419 @ p. 471(1793); emphatically explains the True Principals of The People and their relationship to Their Sovereignty. This Case was so powerful that it caused those factions, democrats, republicans and solists, who were already busy with deceptive work in each State, to bring about the so-called 11th amendment. This so-called amendment, in fact of Law, violated the intent of the Federalist Founders, and took away a Prerogative Due Process Right of all the “Citizens in the several States”, and Their Posterity. This Right, was to sue another State in the one and only Court created by the hand of the People in Article III of the Constitution, which is the Supreme Court, and is Sovereign by its nature and its delegated Right of “Error”, “Writ of Error” when the Constitution, The Law of the People, is in ‘Jeopardy’;
This Court, by the Intent and Nature of its Creator, The People, Owes its highest Duty and allegiance to the People. This “Duty” is to discover and expose All ERRONEOUS acts committed by the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches that, by their intent, are in direct conflict with the Constitution, and inconsistent with the Principal Security of the
Page 18 of 95
Sovereignty of the People who Created it; And, during or after the discovery of such Errors, this Court, by its Sovereign Authority, is emphatically and without question Immune and Exempt from any Reprisal in refusing to exercise their power to enforce those discovered Errors. These discovered Errors of Law are void in their inception, and this Court is not bound by, or held to any rule or code of any subsequent or following act of the legislature or executive or Judicial branch under the discovered “Error”; Mugler v. Kansas (1887) 123 U.S. 623 @ 661; But, the Supreme Court is, and should be, by the Law of its allegiance and creation, extremely Prejudice to the “Law of Its creation, and the Will and Intent of the People who created it,” for the express purpose of protecting and defending the Unalienable Rights of “The People” and “Their Posterity” against All acts of Their REPRESENTATIVES, and as stated by the Chisholm Court, while dealing with the Rights of Contract between the Highest Sovereign Statuses of this Nation. And by the ruling in the Chisholm case, the Due Process Right of a Sovereign Citizen of one State to bring an Original Action of Assumpsit in this Supreme Court against a Union of Fellow Sovereigns incorporated as another State. See the Original Article III U.S. Constitution. 1788 Section 2.
And like the so-called 11th amendment, If you wish to discover, or presume to find the “Alleged Errors” cited by their originators, authenticating the Lawful nature of the following so-called AMENDMENTS, 11 through whatever, happy hunting, because there were, nor are there any to be found!!! And each and every so-called amendment that has now been crammed down the throats of the Posterity after the original Bill of Rights (1791) is a void amendment for failing to show the exact Error, deviation from the truth In the Original Constitution and Treason upon the Posterity of Our Sovereignty. There was never an ‘Error’ discovered, shown, or stated in Article III by the originating proponents or creators of the 11th so-called amendment; Nor can there be any found today. It was the default ruling
Page 19 of 95
of the Chisholm Court and their blistering opinion against the State of Georgia that caused the void enactment of the 11th so-called amendment. It was the overpowering reality of the Sovereignty and Power of the People, addressed by the Chisholm Court, enforcing the absolute “Sovereign Power of the White People” as an Individual Private Citizen of a State to win an action in Equity in the Supreme Court over another State that brought about the creation of the void 11th so-called amendment.
Although not blatantly showing and describing this Fact of Law, The Chisholm Court also showed that Congress is not without “Error”. See Chisholm at p. 420, lines 22&23 where congress erroneously inserts the words “but not exclusive”, which words are not found in the wording of Article III.
Again, Error………..“A wandering or deviation from the Truth.” NW28
The following questions and Answers are based on the Principles of Law as applied to the White European Sovereigns of this Nation:
The question[S] that never came before the Court in any case, especially; Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 Dall 378, 1798, was;
Question 1. Did the Supreme Court, in Chisholm 2Dal419 (1793), “Error” in its Ruling against Georgia?
Answer 1: The Principal of this case is simply stated by the following Supreme Court Ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1965) 384 U.S. 436 @ 491; “Where Rights Secured by the Constitution are involved, there can no rulemaking of legislation that would abrogate them.”: enter the void 11th amendment Error;
Question 2. Was it the Intent of the Founders to vest the highest Sovereignty of this Federal/Union/Nation in A GOVERNMENT over the “People”??
Page 20 of 95
Answer 2: The Revolution and complete Separation of “We The People” from all the other powers on this Earth Secured the Sovereignty of the People, which should be More than enough evidence to Show any one of average intelligence the force of Natural Law and the true Intent of the Founding Fathers Enforcing It. The Federalist Papers, followed by the Chisholm case would be a good starting point for your enlightenment: ”The People surrender Nothing”
Question 3. Is a STATE of this Union higher in its Sovereignty than the “Posterity of the People” of the Founding Fathers who created it???
Answer 3: By the Revolution (1776), “We the People” established the Sovereignty of the People, the States, and the Union of States; and by the Federalists own words; “The People surrender Nothing”; Federalists 84 p.513; The only power enforceable over “We The People” was and is “God”:
Question 4. Could there be found a “Lawful” code, rule, order, treaty or judicial decision, enacted by the legislative, executive or judicial branch of Our government, either, state or federal, purporting to vested it, or any of them, with the power to overturn and or nullify a Constitutional Principal, Established by the Revolution, that Secured the Unalienable Rights of the Life, the Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness to “We the White People and Their Posterity????”
Answer to Question 4: If such a power, by code, rule, statute, treaty or executive order or otherwise, purporting to be such a Law could be found, those creating it, those enforcing it, and those executing it upon the Unalienable Rights of “We The White People or any of Us”, or “Our Posterity”, would be guilty of TREASON!!!!!
The term “Treason” appears only once in the Constitution in Article III Section 3; wherein they state; “Treason against the United States, shall
Page 21 of 95
consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.;….”. The prelude to this Article is found in Federalists No 69, Hamilton states: “All conspiracies and plots against the government, which have not been matured into actual treason, may be screened from punishment of every kind, by the interposition of the prerogative of pardoning.”
So what conspiracy or plot has matured into actual Treason??? And who are the conspirators adhering to Our Enemies????
As the Plot to convert the Peoples Gold into non redeemable LEGAL TENDER BANC paper, and the People to remain as CROWN subjects, was the initial cause of the Revolution (1776), all of those who remained in the States after the revolt, or followed the criminal nature of BANCING that again began in Maryland by Hamilton in the 1790’s, unless they survived the ‘FEDERAL RESERVE ACT’ (1913), they ARE now DEAD; but all those who have endeavored to perpetuate this monstrous immoral criminal act of BANCING against the People and Their Posterity, are in fact of Law co-conspirators to the ongoing crime of ‘BACKING’ and the INTERNATIONAL ACT OF ‘GENOCIDE’ against the White Citizens in the Several States of this American Union and Their Posterity.
The following quote is taken from Bouvier’s’ Law Dictionary (1856);
“ADHERING. Cleaving to, or joining; as, adhering to the enemies of the United States.
-
The Constitution of the United States, art. 3, s 3, defines treason against the United States, to consist only in levying war against them or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
-
The fact that a citizen is cruising in an enemy’s ship, with a design to capture or destroy American ships, would be an adhering to the enemies of the United States. 4 State Tr. 328 ; Salk. 634; 2 Gilb. Ev. By Lofft, 798.
-
If war be actually levied, that is, a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable enterprise,
Page 22 of 95
all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are leagued in the general conspiracy are to be considered as traitors. 4 Cranch. 126.
So, has such an act, or acts of “War” or “Treason” occurred within the jurisdiction of the Executive authority of any one of the States, or the United States of America???
Powers Granted or Prohibited: Article X in Addition to and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America (1791); “The Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the People.”
For those of you who are unfamiliar with the “Law of the Flag” the next time you see a State of Federal Flag with Gold fringe, be informed that the law of the Gold Fringe is “ADMIRALTY”, not the American Common Law; Admiralty equals MARTIAL LAW; No standing Army;
1st Act of War/Treason: hence most of the Common Law Courts fly this Gold Fringe Admiralty Flag, which is an act of war against the Sovereignty of the People.
For Congress To coin gold and silver Money and regulate its Value; 2nd Act of War/Treason: in this case is the printing of the non-redeemable counterfeit notes by a privately controlled alien group (Federal Reserve) and confiscate/steal all the gold and silver from the People;
Congress shall; Establish a uniform rule of Naturalization throughout the United States, 3rd Act of War/Treason: Congress was never vested with the power to naturalize, or to alter the Status of the Elector of the most numerous
Page 23 of 95
branch of the State Legislature; or any member/Trustee of our State and/or Federal Republic;
The United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a Republican Form of Government.
4th Act of War/Treason: To convert our Federal Republic to a “Democracy”, is, in itself the highest crime that could be committed against the People and their Sovereignty!!!!
The principal stated in 2. above would follow here; That a citizen or group of citizens, or persons who are engaged in an immoral constitutionally Prohibited Act such as BANCING, who engage in the act of printing and “exchanging that fraudulently worded foreign paper” for the Peoples Lawful Coin” or Their public and Private Property, are in fact cruising in an enemy’s vessel called “the BANC”, with a specific design to ultimately destroy Our American Common Law monetary system and Our “Republican Form of Government”, while , at the same time exterminating the Common Law Citizen of the State, while confiscating Their Soil, all of which are acts adhering to the enemies of the United States of America, and the Sovereignty of The People!!!!!
For clarification, the term “Common Law” is quoted in the ‘CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE §22.2 WHEREIN IT STATES, “That the Common Law of England, so long as it is not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution of the United State, or the Constitution or Laws of this State, is the rule of decision in all the Courts of this State.” So, England is in Europe and by Noah Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language, is the Land of the White Face. This means that the White Men and Women who are Citizens of this State are the true Posterity and Sovereignty of this Nation and are the source of the American Common Law as descended from the “English Common Law” from Magna Charta 1215.
Page 24 of 95
The ENEMY HERE is the “BANC”, commonly known as and called “THE FEDERAL RESERVE”, of which every officer, employee, elected or appointed officials, both city and county, both state and federal, and most people throughout the States and territories are all on its payroll……………………………..
The subject status of which I speak, although originally a creature of Africa, was, by way of the erroneously enacted 13th , 14th , and 15th amendments to the US Constitution. was used as a vehicle to alter the Lawful status of the White People, and increase the growing presence of the Prohibited BANKS throughout the several States. Although having its original foundation in the 2 Naturalization Act, It was accelerated under the guise of the ‘CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS’ 1866. This subject status is commonly known as “a STATUTORY 14th amendment citizen of the UNITED STATES”.
Madison, in Federalist №43 made the following observation:
“May it not happen, in fine, that the minority of citizens may become a majority of persons, by the accession of alien residents, of a casual concourse of adventurers, or of those whom the constitution of the State has not admitted to the rights of suffrage?”… See Van Valkenberg v. Brown 43 Cal. 43,47 (1872) citing Dred Scott v. Sanford;
The personal body of these foreign alien residents were already among Us. The Constitution identifies them in Article I, Section 2. Paragraph 3, as “……three fifths of all other Persons.” and by the words of the Supreme Court in Scott v. Sanford 60 US 393,408 (1856);:
“And, accordingly, a Negro of the African race was regarded by them as an article of property, and held, and bought and sold as such, in every one of the thirteen colonies which united in the Declaration of
Page 25 of 95
Independence, and afterwards formed the Constitution of the United States.”
This subject STATUS of ‘person’, by legislative act of CONGRESS, became the vehicle to enslave all The People by the phrase “citizens OF THE UNITED STATES” who are, by the wording in the 14th amendment are subject to ‘ITS JURISDICTION’; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.
Remember, Any act of congress not CITING a specific delegation of authority from the Constitution must be construed to have relied on the only two provisions giving it unlimited delegated power over a specific kind of soil for the express purpose of protecting the White People and Their Constitution. These two provisions are found exclusively in Article I, Sec. 8 Cl. 17; and Article IV, Sec. 3, Cl. 2. Of which neither was ever cited as its authority to create the Act of April 9, 1866, entitled “CIVIL RIGHTS BILL”; This Act which was, by its enforcement within the States, another void law in violation and repugnant to the American Common Law and the “Intent of the Founding Federalist Fathers (For further definition of “citizen of THE UNITED STATES”, see chapter II, “The People”)
A Conspiracy or plot is defined as;:” A combination of men for a evil purpose; an agreement between two or more persons, to commit some crime in consort; particularly, a combination to commit treason, or excite sedition of insurrection against the government of a state; a plot; as a conspiracy against the life of a king; a conspiracy against the government.” NW28
It might be well to examine the use and history of the word ‘CIVIL’ as it was used in all the writings of Law, from the Magna Charta to the present day Constitution to discover the hundreds of times this word was used, but only for the specific purpose to distinguish matters of a criminal
Page 26 of 95
nature from that of Law , Equity, Admiralty and Maritime. A “CIVIL CODE” combining Law and Equity found no place in the States, or the United States until the years following the CIVIL WAR. But, as stated, Law and Equity were still isolated principles accept in a few states like Texas, where the Supreme Court admonishes it for combining Law and equity UNDER a “CIVIL CODE”;
This is what the framers of the Seventh amendment had in mind:
“By the common law, they meant what the Constitution denominated in the 3d article LAW, not merely suits which the common law recognized among its old and settled proceedings, but suits in which legal rights were to be ascertained and determined, in contradistinction to those where equitable rights alone were recognized and equitable remedies administered”. Fenn v. Holme 21 How. 41.
“In Texas, the common law has been adopted, but the forms and rules of pleading in common law cases have not, and although the forms of proceedings and practice in the state courts have been adopted in the district court of the United States, yet such adoption must not be understood as confounding the principles of law and equity, nor as authorizing legal and equitable claims to be blended together in one suit”. Bennett v. Butterworth, 52 U.S. 11 How. 669 (1850).
And further,
“It is settled that the “law” of this state includes the common law as well as the Constitution and the codes. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1895, 1899; Victory Oil Co. v. Hancock Oil Co. (1954) 125 Cal. App. 2d 222, 229 [270 P.2d 604].) [3] “ ‘The code establishes the law of this state respecting the subjects to which it relates’; but this … does not mean that there is no law with respect to such subjects except that embodied in the code …. [W]here the code is silent, the common law governs.” Rojo v. Kliger 265 Cal. Rptr. 130, 52 Cal. 3rd 65 (1990);
Page 27 of 95
This is verification of the Principal that was laid down by the Revolution that Birthed the true nature of the American Common Law; which is the act of doing whatever does not infringe upon the rights of the Public At Large, or Your neighbor. In order to exercise the American Common Law, Do not engage the Public At large by posting a sign of Your Calling, or advertising this Calling in any public way, weather by paper, posting, post, sign, adverting, notice, phone directory, business card, internet, or running your private Common Law calling through the BANC. To do otherwise, is to open your Private Doors to the PUBLIC AT LARGE, and all ITS commercial codes, rules, regulations, orders, licenses, taxes and whatever else the GOVERNMENT WANTS or can think of MAKING YOU DO!!!
The Constitution is based on immutable Principles, Constitutions, errors of monarchies, religious edicts, bibles, and untold numbers of other writings by so-called morally advanced wise men throughout history. Its Founders have compiled the best of the best to insure and secure that the American Common Law Rights under God, and there Moral intent, would be Maintained by and for the White People and the Posterity of We the White People.
Which brings Us to the next question of Law??
What Specific Article, Section and or Clause of the Constitution of the United States of America (1788), was cited by Congress authorizing it to enact the Federal Reserve Act in 1913???
As previously cited,The Law, Article X of Amendment states: “The Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor Prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or the People.”
Page 28 of 95
So what Act of “Law” authorized BANCING to become part of this States monitory system?? Not only can none be found, but The Constitution of the United States of America (1788), in Article I, Section 10, Clause 1. States that:
“No State……[including but not limited to California] shall…….coin Money, emit Bills of Credit; make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;….”; Actual, Correct Capitalization;
And it is further Stated in the Act of Statehood for the California State Republic Constitution (1849) Article IV Sections 34, & 35:
“Sec. 34. The legislature shall have no power to pass any act granting any charter for banking purposes; but associations may be formed, under general laws, for the deposit of gold and silver, but no such association shall make, issue, or put into circulation, any bill, check, ticket, certificate, promissory note, or other paper, or the paper of any bank, to circulate as money.
Sec. 35. The legislature of this state shall prohibit, by law, any person or persons, association, company or corporation from exercising the privileges of banking, or creating paper to circulate as money.”
When the MONEY CHANGERS caused Our Common Law California Constitution to be VOIDED by the 1879 fraudulent replacement, leaving out the Prohibition on BANKING, the words “NO BANKING: was displaced by carefully fraudulently worded insertions like; “Sec. 5. The legislature shall have no power to pass any act to pass any charter for banking purposes, but … may be formed under general laws……………..for the purpose of regulating the business of banking. No corporation, association, or individual shall issue of put in circulation as
Page 29 of 95
money, anything but the lawful money of the United States.” California Constitution (1897) Article XIII [Amendment adopted by fraudulent US subject voters November 8, (1910). Enter the ‘FEDERAL RESERVE ACT’ (1913) and “LAWFUL MONEY OF THE UNITED STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” commonly known as a “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE”. The Elector status was eliminated by the US congress with the so-called 15th amendment!!
So just what is “BANKING”????? The principal aim of “BANKING” is, and always has been, to turn non redeemable fiat paper currency into Gold and Silver. It’s much easier than turning lead into Gold because all you need is a “THIEF”, a bunch of gold and silver enriched ignorant People, some ink, paper, and a printing press; and last but not least, “A BANK/C”; historically known as “A MONEY CHANGER” “John 2:14.
“LEGAL”, Or “Lawful”???
When does “LEGAL TENDER” paper, as found on a private “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE”, become “Lawful Money” as identified in the Constitution as gold and silver Coin??? It doesn’t, because the FEDERAL RESERVE is PRIVATE, and is not found anywhere in the Constitution over any one of the several States or their People. But, if that paper was issued by act of congress as applied to the States, it would say in the first line of the paper, “United States Note”, and would then follow as “Redeemable” and Only, When that paper is redeemable in the real, constitutionally struck, under the power of Article I, § 8 Cl. 5, by the U.S. Mint, as in certified gold and silver Coin, and not otherwise.
Script:
1st;, Find a system where the People have a gold and silver monitory standard???!!!! The United States of America and a bunch of ignorant People who don’t understand the American Common Law;
Page 30 of 95
2nd; Wait until most of the founding Fathers are dead, and convince one of the remaining to help setup a bank in the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, where there is no prohibitions against “BANKING”; or better yet in the State next door, like Maryland. That way the building is the property of DC. Art 1/Sec8/ cl.17. What goes on there is no business of the State, or any of Them.
3rd; Let the Printing press role………….and don’t forget to use the Word Federal on the NOTE so all the ignorant People will think it’s a Government issue. Time goes by and more ignorant “People become use to the idea of paper gold and silver… one day, in 1913, the Federal Reserve is born, and its banks start printing “Gold Certificates” numbered from 100 to 100,000 US Dollar denominations.
4th; All that is needed now, is to trade them, or sell them to the ignorant People for Their Gold at face value, you know like a 1 troy oz gold double Eagle for a 20 dollar FRN No problem. A little bit of propaganda goes a long way, and its not long before most of the gold is in the hands of, you guessed it, “THE BANCERS”. Still no problem, paper gold running like water. All is well, except the BANKERS forgot to turn of the printing press. Well, what did they do with the extra double, triple amount of GOLD NOTES?????? I know, lets give, loan, sell, whatever, them to some relatives across the pond!!!
5th: Now the fun begins. Those relatives turn right around and exchange those extra notes for all the Gold. Still no problem until one of the ignorant People decides to turn in all his paper gold to discover all his real gold is gone. Is this Lawful??? No, but its profitable. Oops. Bank run. Now you can see a really lot of “DEPRESSED”, ignorant People. some of which actually jumped out of their own buildings. Real Depression [1929] …What a mess.
Page 31 of 95
So, is the “FEDERAL RESERVE’ a ‘Moral PERSON’??? Do its codes, rules, and paper conform to a ‘Moral Standard’??? If the BANC maintained a full redemption for all the notes printed and in circulation, it might be legal in some other country but is not Lawful as any other Common Law Calling in Our Republican form of Government. But it doesn’t, which is why it’s Prohibited by Law in this State, and even though it has managed to infiltrate our monetary system, it still only operates under the COMMERCIAL CODE that requires a ‘LICENSE’ for it to exist. That Code only applies to DC and Its Territories not a State.
Enter the Law of “LICENSE”; (Lat. licere, to permit). In Real Property Law. A permission. A right, given by some competent authority to do an act, which without such authority would be illegal, or a tort or trespass. When the power [OF LICENSE] is exercised by municipal corporations, [such as a STATE] a license is the requirement, by the municipality, of the payment of a certain sum by a person for the privilege of pursuing his profession or calling,….[taxi driver]……”; Bouvier’s’ 1914 @ p.1976; but only when said calling is WITH THE PUBLIC AT LARGE. A Secured Private Right or Calling is Lawfully exempt from any act of the STATE or FEDERAL/NATIONAL GOVERNMENT;
In Hale v. Henkel(1906) 201 U.S. 43 @ 74, the court emphasized the rights of the Citizen of the State; to wit:
“The Individual may stand upon His Constitutional Rights as a Citizen. He is entitled to carry on His Private business in His own Way. His Power to Contract is Unlimited. He owes no Duty to the State or to His neighbors to divulge His Business, or to open His doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate Him. He owes no such Duty to the State, beyond the protection of His Life and Property. His rights are such as existed by the Law of the Land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from Him by Due Process of Law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among His Rights are a
Page 32 of 95
refusal to incriminate Himself, and the Immunity of Himself and His Property from arrest or seizure except under a Warrant of the Law. He owes nothing to the public so long as He does not trespass upon their Rights.”
(Emphasis added)Capitalization corrected!
They have converted the Unalienable Right to Liberty by the People to travel upon their Public Right of Way and to transport his Private Property or Private Persons thereon, into a licensable, taxable, insurable, criminally punishable “COMMERCIAL PRIVILEGE OF OPERATING A ‘MOTOR VEHICLE, SUBJECT TO A MOTOR VEHICLE CODE DESIGNED for the specific purpose TO REGULATE the COMMERCIAL ACT of transporting persons and or property for hire, PROFIT OR GAIN with the general public. See En re: Stork; 1925 exemption; 18 USC §31 supra
Chapter 2………………….We The People
We The People
Words and Phrases following the Revolution, and strictly Applicable to the _People _of the United States of America from Magna Charta (1215) following the CIVIL WAR, and just preceding the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, June 16, 1866.
“The Best Kings English”; the Best example of the use of the Kings English can be found in the Original Script version of the Original Constitution of the United States of America, (1788) and or its “Literal Print” previously referenced in Rule 1.
“People”; [Proper Noun, First Letter Capitalized] From the Revolution of 1776, and throughout the Sovereign States, the word “People”, as used in the Preamble and throughout the Constitution of and
Page 33 of 95
for the United States of America (1788), and the Federalist Papers, is synonymous with the phrase “Citizen of the State”, who, in their collective Capacity, formed the Political Sovereignty of the United States of America; and as an Individual Private Citizen, enjoy His/Her Private, Prerogatives and Sovereignty; Chisholm vs. Georgia 2 Dall 419 (1793) citing the word “People” 81 times; also see Martin vs. Hunter 14 U.S. 304 (1816); and, Lansing vs. Smith 4 Wendell 9,20 (1829); Dred Scott vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393 (1856). The word “People” appears no less than 620 times in the Federalists Papers; 39 times in the Constitution of California 1849; and 3 times in the original Constitution of the United States of America (1788). These People and Their Posterity, not Their government, have the Exclusive Prerogative Right and Sovereign Power to determine the Qualifications of Their Peers; See authorities from Article 9 of Confederation; Steiner v. Darby; c.. Attached in the body of tabbed exhibits;
“American” Proper Noun; In the United States of America, A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals or copper colored race found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America. Noah (1828); the change is directly associated to the new Sovereign over America commonly called, “Europeans”; “Europe” Proper Noun; [Bochart supposes this word to be composed of white face, the land of White People, as distinguished from the Ethiopians, black-faced people, or tawny inhabitants of Asia and Africa.] Noah (1828); The word “Europe” and “European”, meaning “White”, was used no less than 54 times in the Federalists Papers; the Word White only once in the Articles of Confederation; the word White appears Three times in the 1849 California Constitution. Prior to the Civil Rights Acts, and pre banking, the word “White” can be found in all the State Constitutions, all the naturalization laws, all the Elector qualifications, all the State and Federal election requirements, and in more case law than can be easily counted here.
Page 34 of 95
“State” In the United States of America, (Found 50 times in the original US Constitution) a Union of the European People as Federalists, Princes, Freeholders, Domiciled on Their Demesne Manor (Crown Land) as State Citizens, recognizing and enforcing Unalienable Rights and disciplined in the principal of doing justice to Others. Publius; also see Chisholm v. Georgia referenced in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1914) vol 2 p. 3120;
“Citizen”; according to the many authorities and their writings, this word is of ancient origin. It has been used throughout mans history to describe a group of single minded individuals who have banned together in a particular geography, being a village, town, city, or larger, and to therein establish a protective shield against intruders. This generally accepted word would also be the prefix to that specific geography like, “citizen of Rome”, &ccccccccccccccc…… But in all the authorities citing this word has never in its entire existence been directly associated with, or used in connection with the word “Sovereign”, until, the Revolution ending on July 4, of 1776. The American People of European descent, by their own Power, acquired the Sovereignty over the American Nation and its States. At that point in time, each of Them became a “Citizen of the State” by Their own Hand. And ever since have been plagued by unscrupulous spiritually dead criminally minded people to destroy our Constitution and our People!!!
This phrase “Citizen of the State”, is the foundation upon which this Nation is Secure. It represents the specific, Highest Title of the Sovereign in this Nation. This phrase, “Citizen of the State”, is the fountain from which the Sovereign “Posterity” flows. Without this phrase, “Citizen of the State”, there is no “Sovereignty”; Without this phrase “Citizen of the State” there is No “People, no “Federal State”, No “Unalienable Rights”, and most certainly no “Land of the Free”, or “Home of the Brave”; just a bunch of “denizens”, “subjects”, Banc “chattel”, and 14th so-called amendment “citizens of the UNITED STATES” screaming for their government created, granted privileged “CIVIL RIGHTS”.
Page 35 of 95
In order to fix, the application, definition, and true meaning of the phrase “citizen of the UNITED STATES”, pay close attention to the following paragraph: “It will be observed, that under this Confederation, each State had the right to decide for itself, and in its own tribunals, whom it would acknowledge as a free inhabitant of another State. The term free inhabitant, in the generality of its terms, would certainly include one of the African race who had been manumitted. But no example, we think, can be found of his admission to all the privileges of citizenship in any State of the Union after these Articles were formed, and while they continued in force. And, notwithstanding the generality of the words ‘free inhabitants,’ it is very clear that, according to their accepted meaning in that day, they did not include the African race, whether free or not: for the fifth section of the ninth article [Articles of Confederation] provides that Congress should have the power ‘to agree upon the number of land forces to be raised, and to make requisitions from each State for its quota in proportion to the number of white inhabitants in such State, which requisition should be binding.” Dred Scott vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393,@ p. 418 (1856). In order to see how the African Race was treated by men of Wisdom in the United States of America, look at the founding Constitution, and Article 9, of the Sovereign “Republic of Liberia” (January 5, 1839). Publius;
This phrase “Citizen of the State” is directly opposed to the phrase “citizen of the United States; It is a principal of Our Republican form of government that the Phrase “Citizen of the State” should be well understood by the very People who hold the Sovereignty of this Nation and Each State. There are many citations on this phrase, but, it would be well to ponder a point in our history where the phrase “Citizen of the State” was expressly distinct from the phrase “citizen of the United States”, by Thomas Jefferson in the first two naturalization Acts:
Page 36 of 95
In accordance with the Limited Power vested by the People in the United States of America in Congress Assembled, by and through Article I Section 8, Powers Granted to Congress: Clause 4 states; “To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,…..throughout the United States.” Not in the United States;
Which it did by the following wording:
In the United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).
“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least,……..”
If you recite the Constitution from that specific Article, that vested congress with power to create a rule, it wasn’t, nor has Congress ever been vested with the power to naturalize; in fact the Tenth Article of Amendment, by words so simple, the People prohibits congress from doing any act or exercising any power not explicitly and expressly delegated to it by the Constitution as ratified in 1791.
But, following the establishment of the MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, [hereafter MCDC] on March 3, 1791 [FIRST CONGRESS. SESS II CH 28]; Congress amended the 1st NATURALIZATION LAW by enacting the 2nd NATURALIZATION LAW;
In which Thomas Jefferson states:
United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform rule of Naturalization; and to repeal the act heretofore passed on that subject” (January 29, 1795).
Page 37 of 95
For carrying into complete effect the power given by the constitution, to establish an uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States, as apposed to In the United States [DC MC] [and “Only in a State Court having Common Law Jurisdiction”]
“SEC.1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, [correct capitalization/ lower case “c”] or any of them, [any one of the States] on the following conditions, and not otherwise:
First. He shall have declared, on oath or affirmation, before the supreme, superior, district, or circuit court of some one of the states, or of the territories northwest or south of the river Ohio, or a circuit or district court of the United States, three years, at least, before his admission, that itwas bona fide, his intention to become a citizen of the United States,………………….“
?????WHAT UNITED STATES COULD NATURALIZE??????
The Power Delegated to Congress by The People, as Citizens of a State to naturalize, extended only to, AND throughout the States, and, only to any authorized “aliens”, having the specific qualification, such as their “Race”; “their “Allegiance”; their Intent of “Domicile”; the specific Court having American Common Law jurisdiction to take their “oath of Allegiance in English”; and the minimum resident time for qualifying. This is an American Common Law Principal and Un/Inalienable to the People and Their Posterity. See exhibits of authority, attached under tabbed heading [Rights of The People]
CONGRESS, in voicing its power to naturalize in one of its Admiralty/Maritime Courts, just violated Article X of Amendment by delegating and assuming to itself, as an Artificial MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, the Prohibited authority and Unauthorized Power to NATURALIZE. And by this prohibited act, Congress also created an artificial citizen and subject of and under the general jurisdiction of the municipal corporation called the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; present day
Page 38 of 95
this MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [MCDC] IS More commonly known, AND, extensively expressed as “THE UNITED STATES”. When congress, by way of the alien private bancing cartel began to test the Sovereignty and Un/Inalienable Rights of the People, it started by re-defining the term ‘UNITED STATES’ in most of its CODES like; “When used in this TITLE,… the term “UNITED STATE” included all places….. subject to the jurisdiction of the United States…” which shall include “Guam”; “American Samoa”; Puerto Rico”; “the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”; “the Virgin Islands”; and even a pile of guano. See 18 U.S.C. Chap. 1, §§ 5 through 31;, 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a) (9) & (10), to name a few; also see US Supreme Court decision Hooven v. Evatt 324 U.S.652,671/672 (1944); where it states that “The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses.”……@ p.671; They even use the specific word “State” to identify DCMC, which could not, even, if they wished to do so, become one of the independent Federal States of this Federal Union under Our Federal Trust Constitution;
When is a Federal/National court vested with American Common Law Jurisdiction; This term, Federal Common Law has been extensively explained and defined in great detail by the Supreme Courts, both State and Federal, and only applies to the Supreme Court of the United States of America, and the Circuit Court of the United States of America..under Article III; And, Where the Lawful Title and or Constitutionally Secured Rights are squarely before a Court, in order for it to proceed it must have Common Law, or At Law jurisdiction. No person can vest a court with full jurisdiction where either Personam, Subject Matter, or Geography is lacking; and, The Supreme Court has jurisdiction in Law where a State is a Party, and the Circuit Court has jurisdiction in Law when Citizens of different States are parties; but neither is vested with the Common Law Power to Naturalize an “Alien” to the position of a “Citizen of the State” simply because these Article III Federal Courts are
Page 39 of 95
not creatures of any one of the States. See Glidden v. Zdanok 370 US 530 (1962).
The truth of this matter is simply that upon the migration of such individuals qualified to take up the sovereignty with state citizenship, after establishing a “Domicile” in anyone of the U.S. territories not MCDC, they must first create a Republican form of Constitution with Common Law Meets and Bounds [Latitude and Longitude] for that yet to be establish State. And upon its qualification in accordance with Article IV Sec. 4, as being a “Republican Form of Government”, and their allegiance to the “Citizens in the several States” and Their Constitution, all the People so qualified by the provisions of the 1st Naturalization Act, including any pre-qualified Citizen of any one of the already established States of the American Union became, at that moment, “Citizens of the new State” so established with full Sovereignty, Prerogatives, and Unalienable Rights.
Next we come to a word that the Founders shunned because of its relationship to that dreaded monarch that the Revolution was fought for permanent separation. But whether they, the Founding Fathers, like it or not, the Posterity are in fact of Law and Principal, “Princes” by the strict meaning and construction of this League of Federal States United as a Union under God.
A “League”, An alliance or confederacy between princes or states for their mutual aid and defense; or, politically correct would be cited as, “The United Princes of Their American States”;
“Prince” In the United States of America, is, Synonymous with “The Son of God”; “The People” (60 US 393,419); “Their Posterity”, “Descendants; children, children’s children, indefinitely; the race that proceeds from a progenitor. (NW28); A “Citizen of one of the Several States of the American Union”; Dred Scott vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393, 419
Page 40 of 95
(1856); A “Freeholder” in His “Demain Manor”; An absolute estate in perpetuity, and the largest possible estate a Man can have, being in fact, Allodial in its Nature; and as equal to the Crown Land, called the “Demesne Manor. NW28; A “Juryman” must be a “Freeholder” NW28; an “Elector“ qualified by the Common Law of these United States of America; a “Militia Man” also qualified by the Common Law of these United States of America, and Citizen of the State, Domiciled in the County; and any other individual who might have allegiance to that particular State; and last but not least, all the Constitutionally qualified State and Federal Legislative, Executive and Judicial Trustees Elected by the constitutionally qualified Elector Citizens of a State, under the Secured Established Principles of the Founding Fathers and God; “Where Rights Secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate Them. “See Miranda vs. Arizona 384 U.S. 436,491 (1966); and People v. De La Guerra 40 Cal 311,341–344 (1870); This Prohibition also includes any so-called Amendment to the Constitution, 11 on.
Next comes the word “Federal” that was and is the defining Principal used to Establish the Common Law identified as a world Unit created by the Founding Fathers, defined by NW28, as follows:
“FED’ERAL”, a. [from L. f dus, a league, allied perhaps to Eng. wed, Sax.]…..
- Pertaining to a league or contract; derived from an agreement or covenant between parties, particularly between nations.
-
- Consisting in a compact between parties, particularly and chiefly between states or nations; founded on alliance by contract or mutual agreement; as a federal government, such as that of the United States.
- Friendly to the constitution of the United States. [See the Noun]}
FED’ERAL, n. An appellation in America, given to the friends of the constitution of FED’ERALIST, the United States, at its formation
Page 41 of 95
and adoption, and the political party which favored the administration of President Washington.” NW28
“Federalist” was not a political party, but a “Principal” of Liberty and Sovereignty: An appellation in America, given to the friends of the Constitution of the United States at its formation and adoption, which was not a “DEMOCRACY” or a “REPUBLIC”, but in fact and Principal a “Republican Form” of Government. Article IV§4 US Constitution 1788.
A “Democracy”, vests the right of suffrage to all classes; such was Athens, which did not work, ever; DEMOCRACY was held synonymous with COMMUNISM in the WWII training manual; and enemy of this Union; A “Republic”, such as “ROME” was a system where the peoplehad no rights, but were privileged under the Pope and the consorting Emperors; Neither of these two ALIEN SYSTEMS were ever considered by the Founding Fathers in the establishment of our Federation, but were in fact completely and totally denounced as being neither a pure Republic or a Democracy, but a “Republican Form of government”. See Federalist Papers ….Madison №10&48 p. 309; paragraph 6.
If the preceding definitions of facts are Lawful, and of sound Principal and the Intent of Our Founders, it then follows that in order for any qualified agent, State or Federal, City or County, appointed or otherwise, who takes, or has taken an Oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, and that agent becomes or aids a member of a non constitutional faction, then it follows, that said agent, by becoming a “Trustee” of the People, who were themselves, by the principals of the Constitution all “Federalists”, had to also be “Federalists” themselves until that alien faction could eliminate or annihilate the People, “Citizens of the State”, and this Federal Union. By becoming a “Democrat” or “Republican”, or any faction not “Federalist”,
Page 42 of 95
and being on the alien Banc Payroll, constitutes an act in direct violation of that Oath, and “Treasonous” as to the People, Their Posterity and Their Sovereignty!!!!!! Publius
In short, these factions by way of CODES, AMENDMENTS and BANCING, and massive FRAUD and the extermination of the European descendants of the Founding Fathers; the transformation of the People as “Citizen of a State” of these United States of America, into subject chattel citizens of the UNITED STATES, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; Confounded and seized the Allodial titles to Their Demain Manors converting them into “residential”, commercial, agricultural, taxable, alien PUBLIC PROPERTY; And, by the allowance of an alien constitutionally prohibited faction, have converted their Substance and Coin and Labour into non redeemable, LEGAL TENDER BANC PAPER.
This alien faction (BANCERS AND THEIR OVERLORDS) created all the “CIVIL RIGHT’, “CIVIL CODES”, “CIVIL LIBERTIES”, AND even A “CIVIL/SUBJECT citizen of the MCDC UNITED STATES”; and under the guise of equality, failed to mention or use the words Sovereign, Unalienable, or Prerogatives, or properly Capitalize “Citizen of a State”, in any phrase, executive, legislative, or judicial ruling, to identify the African Race; but in fact, not only identified them as SUBJECT TO MCDC, but created a special rule applicable only to them for any of their government created and granted ‘CIVIL RIGHT VIOLATIONS. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Wadleigh v. Newhall. (1905 CC Cal) 136 F 941. Sounds and looks like “Genocide” and “Treason” to Me. Publius
Chapter 3………………. Their Sovereignty
Page 43 of 95
The Sovereignty of the White People
“In the United States of America”, from the Revolution of (1776), the following words and phrases, although taken from other language in other cultures, specifically and strictly “Defined”, apply to and are applicable [O]nly, to the highest Title and Sovereignty of Man in relation to his fellow Man, and so far, [O]nly in this American Union. Publius
By the Power of God, Man is vested with all the Power of Sovereignty that he could, and does exercise in His Person and Privacy, or, He can exercise it to violate the sovereignty of any or all other creatures of God. But it is the omnipresence of God in Man that create the effect of these caused violations called “consequences” that Man will learn in order to attain the true nature of Heaven on Earth.
The Sovereignty and Prerogatives that Evolved onto the White People as Citizens of a State at the Revolution (1776), also brought with it the Principal use of “Proper Nouns” and Their common usage which previously applied Only to the Crown Royals of Europe, but now, with the separation of One People from the tyrants of the World, specifically applies to “The White People”, as Descendants of Europeans born in America. The following words identified as “Proper Nouns”, found in the Original Script, and the Literal Print of the Constitution of the United States of America (1788), are some of these Properly Capitalized Words; examples; “People”, “Order”, “Justice”, “Union”, “Tranquility”, “Welfare”, “Blessings”, “Liberty”, “Posterity”; “Powers”, “Members”, “Year”, “States”, “Electors”, “Qualifications”, “Branch”, “Representative”, “Citizen”, “Inhabitant”, “Vessels”, “Money”, “Coin”, “Post Offices”,; all of these Words, and others, which have Special/Proper/Specific Meaning, Applicable only to the White Sovereign People with newly vested Royal Prerogatives and Unalienable Rights with
Page 44 of 95
Their newly vested Allodial/Demain Manor/Castle and Land Titles. The subjects of England have no sovereignty, and still bow down to their Crown and Pope, but the “Citizen of an American State”, unlike the “subject of the crown”, has access through the Sovereign Door at the Vatican.
“Sovereign”. A chief Ruler with Supreme Power; One possessing Sovereignty. (q.v.) It is also applied to a King or other Magistrate with limited Powers. In The United States the sovereignty resides in the Body of the People. Vide Rutherf. Inst. 282. The Union and exercise of all human power possessed in a State; it is a combination of all Power; it is the Power to do Everything in a State without accountability; to make laws, to Execute and to Apply them: to impose and collect taxes, and, levy, contributions; to Make war or Peace; to form Treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign Nations, and the like. Story on the Const. Sec. 207.
But this definition “is” flawed because in the United States of America, the “State” is an ARTIFICIAL PERSON, in the nature of a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, that was created By AND For the White Sovereign People; “It”, by and through its “Trustee/Agents, acts only in accordance with That Law of the Constitution that was created explicitly by the White People in Their Sovereign Political Capacity. Its representatives, although individual Sovereign Citizens of a State on Their Private Side, can act only in accordance with the Constitution specifically on Their Trustee side. ‘The Trustee’, as they are now entitled, have no personal sovereignty over the People, only official “Duty”; this “Duty”, and the jurisdiction it commands, comes only within the limited and specific Article, Section and or clause of the Constitution that created their trustee position and its specific “Duty”. Their artificial SOVEREIGNTY is only sovereign when dealing with the express powers vested in it while dealing with other SOVEREIGNTIES; But, each of them, even though expressly limited to a specific rule, could and have gone far beyond that delegation and have taken part in the elimination of Our American Common Law, and replaced it with A CODE SYSTEM, of which origin is traced directly to an EMPEROR of a foreign jurisdiction.
Page 45 of 95
It is a matter of strict Principal, and as a direct result of the White People using the “Righteous Law” as a Foundation for Our Foundation, that We are unique to all the other Sovereignties of the World. In this uniqueness, We have decided to exercise our Sovereignty to follow the Righteous Law, and to use its Principles for the creation of Our Constitutions, Original State and Federal. They fall under the strict definition of “The American Common Law”.
In OTHER SYSTEMS of government, that sovereignty resides in the abstract, artificial Body of its Nation and represents the general subject people as a whole. But these Powers are exercised by Delegation or internal appointment, to biased individuals that are financially corrupted in his/her private capacity and in consort with a greater influence that is only interested in the total financial control of all the people and the land.
When strictly analyzed, this word “Sovereignty” when quoted, enforced and identifying the American Government”, is, strictly speaking, a “limited” Municipal Power, that is divided into three delegated powers; namely, the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judiciary;
The First, [Legislative] is the LIMITED AUTHORITY and “Duty” of its constitutionally qualified trustees, to exercise a specific, expressed, delegated authority, conditionally limited to make [O]nly those specific “Statutes” that conform to the specific subject of its specific jurisdiction and the “American Common Law”, and “NOT OTHERWISE”; These legislative “Trustees”, as they are now entitled, do not have free rein to replace the American Common Law Constitutions with COMMERCIAL CODES and RULES that may now be cited as authority, and then be used by this new faction of solists to exterminate the “Private Prerogatives of the Sovereign People” [Citizen of the State], or, to Convert the Sovereign People into “subjects” of a foreign POWER; or to convert Their gold and silver Coin into non-redeemable, foreign “PAPER”. The “FACTION” of
Page 46 of 95
which I speak constitutes the Unauthorized, Constitutionally prohibited migration and importation of a group of “ignorant people”, who’s hearts are filled with their uncontrolled lust for power, their greed for money, the exercise of vanity and ego to enforce their superiority over other People, and a complete and total disdain and disregard for the Rights of others, and their uncontrolled anger and relentless drive to completely exterminate the “American Common Law”, its “Trust Constitutions”, and the Sovereignty of its Individual White People as a “Citizen of one of the States of this American Union”;
The second, [Executive] is the delegated Power and “Duty” of the Constitutionally qualified “Trustees”, to execute the Statutes and sub codes created by the Legislature that are expressly limited and authorized that conform to the original intent of the “American Common Law”. By their nature, under this system, the following terms, “Law of the Land” and “Lawful”, is the “Constitution” as it was created directly by the People under God and interpreted in strict accordance with Gods direct supervision and guidance;. The second term, “Legal”, follows a CODE and subdivision of the Constitution but is not a Statute that conforms in total to that specific article of the Constitution, or the American Common Law. The American Common Law is the dividing line between the Private Unalienable Prerogatives of the State Citizen and all other commercial powers of government; The Bill of Rights is the best example of the Prohibitions of government, and The 1st Naturalization Law is the best example of the limited power of government to perpetuate the original status of the White People: see Chapter I [The Law]
The third, [Judicial] is that limited Power to apply the Statutes in strict accordance with the Law and Rights of the People, both Public, COMMERCIAL and Private. This Branch is, divided into cases of the American Common Law [Rights and Titles], by Equity [Contract], over Admiralty [On the Water], or Maritime [between land and water]; all of issues in dispute; But all said courts are bound by the specific rules that apply in accordance with the American Common Law, and to Judge the
Page 47 of 95
Disputes which arise among the Citizens, and to Punish American Common Law crimes accordingly. “Strictly speaking, in our Republican Forms of Government, the Absolute Sovereignty of the Nation is in the People ___of the Nation as “Citizens of a State”; (q.v.) and the ___residuary sovereignty ___of each State, ___not ___granted to any of its ___public functionaries, is in The People of the State. See Chisholm (q.v.) 2 Dall. 471; and vide, generally, 2 Dall. 433, 455; 3 Dall. 93; 1 Story, Const. Sec. 208; 1 Toull. n. 20 Merl. Repert. h.t. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856). But, “In the United States of America”, the first and primary attribute of “Sovereignty” lies, and is found exclusively within the Body of each Man and Woman as a “Citizen of the State” __while acting in a strictly __“Private Capacity”; and PROTECTED by Grand Jury when that sovereignty has been violated. Publius
To recall from Chapter I, [The Law] any and all the CODES and RULES are of a COMMERCIAL NATURE, and follow the strict course from a specific Statute, that must be cited as the authority to enact it, and in order to govern, enforce and judge all those acts effecting the general public by anyone who chooses to contract with it, “The GENERAL PUBLIC”, whether it be a “Citizen of the State”, or citizen/subject __of the __municipal corporation UNITED STATES, or a citizen or subject of a foreign state, or a “Trustee”, or an alien, or even the UNITED STATES or one of them; whether said contract be verbal, in writing, or by deed. Again, see Hooven v. Evatt in Chapter 2, supra.
In Accordance with Our Federal System, and by the Principles of Its Specific Terms, the State, and the United States are, by Our strict Federal definitions, are “Not Sovereign” over the White People, but nothing more than “Creatures of the People”, and therefore just artificial MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, that can act only in an “OFFICIAL CAPACITY, and then Only in accordance with their “Charter” [the Constitution], by their “CORPORATE OFFICERS”, Which, for the Safety and Welfare of the
Page 48 of 95
People, are also qualified From the People; but who swear by Their Allegiance to their CHARTER, to agree to serve The People as Their “TRUSTEES”. And if THEY should fail to Execute their sworn Duties in strict accordance with the Law and Its Intent, or to propose the extermination of Our Federal System, to be subjected to the Charge of “Treason”…………
So, It follows that: The White People = A Citizen of His State, who in Their collective capacity are = The Creators of the Law = That is The Constitution = Which is An Express Trust of the White People = Represented by the White Trustees of the White People = A State and the States United in Congress = A Union of artificial MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS = The State and Federal CORPORATE OFFICERS, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial = A system unique and unequaled to any of the systems of this World.
It therefore naturally follows that:
Once the qualified Citizen of a State is chosen and Elected by the Qualified Electors of His State, to take an active role in the Government as a “TRUSTEE” of the People in Whole, He no longer executes any power of Sovereignty but only “OFFICIAL’, and Only in strict accordance with The delegated Mandates and Prohibitions under the Constitution from which He voices His Oath of Allegiance on the Christian Bible. His Personal Private Sovereignty and Ultimate Allegiance to God still remain; but, these special attributes do not come within the scope or execution of the TRUSTEE Duties of His TRUSTEE position in the GOVERNMENT. Only by the express delegated authority of the Constitution does He, as TRUSTEE, act, and not otherwise. If he fails to legislate, execute, or judge the Law as Mandated, he does not belong to that Political Representative Body entrusted to Him by The White People with Their power and authority to protect the Secured, Unalienable Rights and Sovereignty of “The White People. Publius
Page 49 of 95
The following citations have not been overturned:
In M’Culloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 405, 4 L. ed. 579, 601, Chief Justice Marshall said:
‘The government of the Union, then (whatever may be the influence of this fact on the case), is, emphatically and truly, a Government of the People. In form and in Substance it Emanates from Them. Its Powers are granted by Them, and are to be exercised directly on Them, and for Their Benefit.’
See also Martin v. Hunter, 1 Wheat, 304, 324, 4 L. ed. 97, 102, opinion by Mr. Justice Story.
In Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 441, 15 L. ed. 691, 715, Chief Justice Taney observed:
‘The new government was not a mere change in a dynasty, or in a form of government, leaving the nation or sovereignty the same, and clothed with all the rights, and bound by all the obligations, of the preceding one. But, when the present United States came into existence under the new government, it was a new political body, a new nation, then for the first time taking its place in the family of nations.’
And in Miller on the Constitution of the United States, p. 83, referring to the adoption of the Constitution, that learned jurist said:
__‘It was then that a nation was born.’ __previous cites from Kansas vs. State of Colorado 206 U.S. 46, 81(1907).
The primary attribute of “Sovereignty” is the “Land”.
The ___People ___conquered this Land, — not the government;
The ___People ___Hold this Land, — not the government;
Page 50 of 95
The ___People ___Hold the Ultimate Title to this Land, — not the government;
The ___Peoples ___Domicile is in Law and by Conquest, a ___Demesne Manor ___in this State, — not a RESIDENCE, or Land Patent of the government;
The ___People ___Till This Soil, — not the government;
The ___People ___Grow Their Food, — not the government;
The ___People ___Produce Their Posterity, — not the government;
The People ___Qualify Their ___Peers, — not the government;
God Created the People, — not the government;
The ___People ___Created the GOVERNMENT, — not the government;
The People ___Make the ___Law, — not the government;
The People ___are Exempt from all regulation in Their ___Privacy, — not the government;
God Created Unalienable Rights ___FOR the ___People, — not the government;
The People ___Exercise ___Unalienable Rights, — not the government;
The People, and only the People ___exercise the __DELEGATED Power __of the government as TRUSTEES, who are then still subject to the Will of the ___People,
The ___People ___as Citizen Trustees make the Rules, — not the government;
The ___People ___as Citizen Trustees Enforce the Rules, — not the government;
Page 51 of 95
The ___People ___as Jurors decide the Law, — not the government;
The People are the Militia, — not the government;
These are just some of the Principles ___that Mandate why the White conquering ___People as Citizens of a State ___are the ___Sovereign, and, — not the government;
So, just what exactly is the “GOVERNMENT”????
Our Republican form of Government, is comprised Of three branches of the People as the “People”, as White Male European Citizens Electors in and of the Several States 21 years+ ‘White Male Trustees 25 years+; And for all the People, as White Europeans Born in One of the several States or Naturalized in one of Their State Common Law Courts, from Birth to Death and Their Posterity!!! All this, not for power, or glory, but For One Purpose, to be a Vehicle of and for God By His Example to show all People and Races the path Home to God.
So just what is Our “Republican Form of Government”?????????????????????
Many authorities, such as the Federalists, and many other different so-call authorities have posed many varied examples of just what a “Republican form of Government” might be; but in all these examples they did not, without exception qualify the “Specific race, age, gender or political status” that Our __“Republican Form of Government” __is composed of.
First and foremost I previously cited the Federalists Papers as the final Authority when interpreting the Constitution; and where the Founding Fathers use Specific well known words and terms familiar to
Page 52 of 95
them and their immediate Posterity. For example, in the Federalist Papers, The word “People” was cited 620 times in that document, followed by Europe, 42 times; “European” 12 times; “Citizen” 27 times; Representative(s) 247 times; “Union” 376 times; “Federal” 325; the term “States” 857 times; “State” 796 times; and the word “White” appears Zero, none, not even 1 single time. According to Our Blood Line, as stated by the Supreme Court of the Unite States of America, all these words were and still are synonymous with the words “White People”, why? Because they were all White Europeans born or naturalized in one of the several States; see Dred Scott v. Sanford previously cited.
And therefore, For clarification of just what the Founding Fathers meant when They identified all the special Parts of this Federal Union The Common Ground for all the previously cited words used by the Founding Fathers is in the one Common Race of the “White People”. This “___White Race” ___of European descent, is the Foundation of Our Federal Union. Examples and use of the word “White” are available in more documents, State and Federal, Supreme Courts, Law Dictionaries and in all the States and Federal statutes from as many sources as you wish to discover prior to the treasonous 15th so-called Amendment, and the so-called reconstruction period following the ‘CIVIL WAR’;
So simply put, Our Republican form of Government is a Government “Of”, “By”, and “For” the “White People”, and when stated “Of”, means: 1st :All White Males 21 and older, English Speaking, Citizen of a State and qualified Elector; such as qualified by Article II §1, Constitution of California (1850)
2nd : By the White People, who are All White Males 25 and older Citizen of a State for Representative; 30 for Senator; 35 and older for President; See Article I and II US Constitution; and,
3rd : For the White People that includes All of Them Male and Female and Their Posterity.
Page 53 of 95
Those of you people who are unwilling, or find yourself not constitutionally or spiritually qualified to take part in Our Sovereignty, are either transient aliens or just uninformed and or ignorant to the American Common Law. It is by these facts of truth that you are subjected to the will and control of our Police Power and its constitutionally authorized general commercial codes. You know your status by the ID you carry and by your belief in the commercial civil system of the government that issued the COMMERCIAL ID’s that you carry and you live by. See Box below.
The concept of a Sovereign People is different from all the other systems of the world, and is certainly extraordinary to most people; But, it is never the less a physical and spiritual truth. The fact remains that too many people, regardless of race, are to steeped in their own ethnic traditions to be willing to break away from such controlled concepts of their individual and mass collective ideas about a people not ruled by a king or democratic type government. Such was the Act of Revolution (1776) by Our White Founding Fathers. God takes no part in the fears of people and therefore never expects to break the image of these peoples insecurity. It is the nature of such a system of parental monarchal control that actually deprives them of their discovery of the source of real security. Despite the fact that their belief in such a controlled system exists for their benefit and security, it still remains undiscovered until they take the fearful step of total responsibility to acquire the spiritual freedom and Unalienable Right to grow according to Gods Law, as apposed to Man’s civil codes. Publius
______________________________________________
Chapter 4……….The People’s Rights
The People’s Rights
Page 54 of 95
Where, on or in this Earth World, can a Hu man go, to exercise the Freedom to follow a Law, that rewards Him for becoming a Conscious Vehicle for God???
And if such a place does exist, does the Law of That Land ___Secure ___His Right to Operate that Vehicle???
And If such a Law does exist, is it defined as “Inalienable” or “Unalienable”???
We need look no further than the perfected examples cited by the English Jurist Blackstone and his compilation of the “Kings Prerogatives” listed in Chapter 7 of his Commentaries written on or about June 23, 1753; some of which in the following list are paraphrased as they would appear if, the Kings prerogatives were cited in Our Bill of Rights, or by the Wisdom of Our early Supreme Courts:
The definition of “Prerogatives of the Crown is “Inalienable” _[NW28] and then follows with the Word _“Unalienable”, both of which are derived from many other cultures and languages, But, they include, but are not limited to the following:
1st; His Right to Travel in his Private Carriage without an England taxi registration plate, and or operator’s license , and mandatory auto/carriage/motor vehicle insurance:
2nd; His Right to possess the Lawful Title [Manufactures Certificate of Origin] for all his Private carriages: whether drawn by horse, motor, engine, or other type of propulsion:
3rd; His Right to Contract Privately in any manner He chooses, and to transport his Persons and or Property resulting from said Private Contract upon his Rights of Way while displaying a Crown authorized Exempt Placard/Plate: but being responsible for any damage he might cause to the Pubic or Their constitutionally authorized Property:
Page 55 of 95
4th; His Right to engage in unlimited Private Contracts without a social security or other permissive type number:
5th; His Right to receive or pay gold and silver Coin in payment of any debt or any agreeably completed Contract:
6th; His Right to hold and enjoy, and develop His Demesne/Demain Manor [His Private Real Property] of a reasonable common law size, free of any tax or rent, or code requirements:
7th; His Right to keep and bare arms of any nature [concealed or otherwise]:
8th; His Right to choose and qualify his peers [for any dispute arising between Him and his subjects/resident aliens, or Neighboring Kings]:
9th; His Right to engage The woman of His choosing, under the “Common Law” without permission of the parliament and or their License:
10th ; His Right to Qualify and Identify His Posterity [which, is none of Parliaments business].
By The Revolution 1776, this Independent Sovereign Nation was born; and the People surrendered “Nothing”; but, in fact gained all the Prerogatives of the Crown, within this Nation. See Chisholm v. Georgia; Lansing v. Smith; Dred Scott v. Sanford; the Original Constitutions both California State (1849) and The Federal (1788 ) and Its 10 additional Original Articles as the 1st and only Lawful Amendment (1791);
These Prerogatives of The People are, in a single word, “Unalienable”;
“Unalienable” In the United States of America, “The state of a Thing or Right which cannot be sold. Things which are not in COMMERCE, such as a State Citizen’s Private Life, Private Liberty, [Private Real Property to a non qualified State Citizen], and Private Happiness. It also includes a Public road or a Right of Way; [the Kings/State Citizens Highway] the Right to receive certified Article I, Sec
Page 56 of 95
10 Cl. 1 Specie Coin for Our Labour; Natural Organic Food and Water from Mineral rich Soil; a Minimum amount of Demain Allodial Land; a Judicial Writ of Error; and last but not least to be identified in accordance with Our Right of Sovereignty and State Citizenship; all of which are in their Nature “Not subject to a Lien”, or “Alienable”, but in fact of “The American Common Law”, Unalienable as to the Citizen of the State. See “Citizen” defined and distinguished by Congress in the 1st Naturalization Laws March 26, 1790, and the conflicting 2nd Naturalization Laws, January 29, 1795, of which the second followed the establishment of D.C., wherein Congress states; “That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise:”
In the smallness of mans mind everything has a price tag, [even the soil upon which he exists] or value of some form or other; But not Until he is forced to pay for the consequences of his inequities, and discovers that there is no amount of prayer, money, even a pound of flesh or otherwise, that will satisfy this debt; then and only then does He surrender to God the things of his dilemma which include his “ Attachments, Anger, Greed, Lust, Ego and Vanity” in total. Publius
__In the United States of America __(1776), The “Federalist Founders” used the term “Prerogative” 29 times, and the term “sovereign” 92 in The Federalist Papers. Although these words identified the crown heads of a system The Founders wanted no Part of; But, Their act of Revolt, and the Position created by That Revolt impregnated the very Principles of Sovereignty and its Prerogatives in Them and Their Posterity, whether They wanted Them or not. The Following is a List of the Sovereign Prerogative Rights and Powers vested in the Citizen of the State at the Revolution (1776), and Confirmed by Our highest Authorities:
Page 57 of 95
1. , a “_Private ___White Citizen of the State” of His/Her Domicile can never be a “resident”, “tenant”, or “person”; (See Blackstone ch. 7 § 336) and United Mine Workers __330 U.S. 258 footnote 23/24 (1947));
2., The “White Common Law Citizen”, qualified Elector, by His Constitutionally elected Common Law Qualified House and Senate have determined the nature and substance of His Coin; See US Const. Article I, § 10 Cl. 1, Unaltered;
3., The “Private White Citizen of the State” has the absolute Prerogative Right to the Religious Freedoms of his Choice, See Article 1 of Amendment to the U.S. Const (1791);
4., The “Private White Citizen of the State”, in his Private capacity, Travels upon His common Highways as a matter of “Unalienable Right”, See Preamble U.S. Const.; ___En re: Stork ___167 Cal. 294 (1914); (Cal. Stats. 1925, ch 412, p. 833. Approved by the Governor May 23, 1925.)
5., The “Private White Citizen of the State”, through His Constitutionally qualified Representatives regulates all COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY affecting the general Public at Large but that COMMERCIAL delegated POWER DOES NOT regulate the White Citizen of the State Who is “Exempt” while in the exercise of His Private Rights of Life, Private Liberty, Owning Private Property or the pursuit of Private Happiness; See Hale v. Henkel 201 U.S. 43,74 (1905);
6., The “White Citizen of the State”, at the Revolution, “Surrenders Nothing”, and owes Allegiance to no man, only God; See The Federalists №84;
7., The “White Citizen of the State” is the fountain of Honor, of Office, and of Privilege who, as the creator of the Constitution, erected and OR disposed of all Federal political offices; See the Preamble and Article IV Section 4, US Constitution;
8., The “White Citizen of the State” is the fountain of “Law”, and in all cases effecting the Life, Liberty and Property of his Peers, He has the final Word as to the Law, and the Facts; See Article VII of Amendment (1791) and Taylor v. Virginia 100 U.S. 664 (1880);
Page 58 of 95
9. , All Criminal proceedings are commenced “In The Name of the White People”, by Grand Jury Indictment of His Peers, “White Common Law Citizens of the State”, comprised of “White People Freeholders”, which evidence must be supported by affidavits of two or more witnesses or irrefutable fact, and prosecuted by the Qualified Elected State Attorney General, as the Highest “Common Law Officer” in the State; by a Judge Elected by the Qualified Common Law White Citizen of the State;
10., The Greatest wrong a Citizen of this “Federal” State can do to Him/Herself and the “Posterity”, is to Allow the Unalienable, God given “Private Prerogatives” Secured by the Founding Fathers, For these United State of America, to be converted into CORPORATE PRIVILEGES, and by the “ARTIFICIAL STATUS” listed in the Red Box, are now subject to and controlled by a CORPORATE LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL POWER, who all receive their compensation from the alien FEDERAL RESERVE. Publius
________________________________________
Chapter 5………..The People’s Land
The Peoples Land
“Land; The United States is denominated the land of freedom.” Noah Webster (1828)
The primary attribute of “Freedom” is “Sovereignty” which leads Us to the foundation of the Sovereignty of the People of the several States of this American Federal Republican system, which is, “The Land”. As previously cited from the Federalists Papers, the term “People”, is synonymous with European and appears 620 times and 54times respectively. So just who and what were the Founding Fathers??? the answer is unquestionably answered as, “People” __from __“Europe” __the __“Land” of the “White Face”!!
Page 59 of 95
If this sounds like a bigoted or prejudiced racial statement, then the person reading this Dictionary is either ignorant of the Law, or has no concept of one People exercising the God given Sovereignty that All People have access to, but that only the White European People in the several States have fought, bled, and died, so that their Posterity might take part in this unique example and American experiment. The average person, regardless of race, has a natural fear of self responsibility. He/She, is secure in the control of a few. This is the Nature of Man on Earth. But this Federal System was birthed for those of Us who are Responsible. Our only question might be’, is just how far backwards do the responsible People among Us have to be driven before They again Stand up and Say “Enough is Enough”??? Publius
In Repetition:
The White European People conquered this Land, — not their government;
The White European People Hold this Land, — not their government;
The White European People hold the Ultimate Title to this Land, — not their government;
The White European Peoples Domicile is, in Law, a Demesne Manor in this State, not a Patent or RESIDENCE, and is subject only to God, — not their government;
The White European People till This Soil, — not their government;
The White European People Grow their Food in the soil of this Land, — not their government;
The White European People entrusted their Unalienable Rights to the Land, in a government elected from The White European People ; by The White European People; and, For The White European People, — not of, by, or for the government;
Page 60 of 95
This started with a “Revolution” (1776) and has culminated through many carefully calculated wars, both foreign and domestic; These wars, unlike the Revolution of 1776, were not of, by or for the People, but were carefully calculated but necessary. This wanton disregard for human life is almost unprecedented through Out History. This point is not easily arguable, but the resolution of the true cause of these wars will bear the fruit in the form of an effect called Knowledge and Wisdom. From the Effect will come the renewed knowledge of just exactly what is meant by an “Act of Treason” against the Sovereignty of the White People. It need not be redefined, but simply understood.
Once you turn over Your Law of the Land, the key to Your vault, the Title to Your Land, and the souls of your Posterity to a bunch of THIEVING BANCERS and their MURDERING DIRECTORATES, you should not be at all surprised that you have now, as stated by the Federalists, woken up a slave in the land that your Founding Fathers died to Secure for You!
If those People among Us who cannot trace their race to the Founding Fathers still contend that they have been vested with all the “Unalienable Rights” secured to the White People in these several States, now is the time to quit crying for your CIVIL RIGHTS, and Demand Sovereign Prerogatives. There is no other way. The first principal for the defeat of a Nation is to eliminate the Sovereign People by combining them with a subject class, separating them from their Land; poison their soil, their water, their air; Steel their Coin and debase their posterity; in other words, infiltrate, divide and conquer.
In order to grasp a better understanding of the Principal of Sovereignty when taking care of the Soil, we will look at an overreaching Act of congress called “PRE-EMPTION”; and for clarification, is another word having its roots in a monarchal system such as Europe, from whence
Page 61 of 95
it comes. More important is the fact that this Act falls in line with all the other terms and words that came into being just following the CIVIL WAR. The only reason that I use this act is that it uses certain word and terms expounding the American Common Law Principles applicable to theproper care taking by a White European Citizen of a State, of the Soil of His Demesne/Demain Manor/Castle; BUT this ACT IS IN NO WAY BINDING UPON THE “Common Law Claim” CLAIM OF A “White Citizen of a State”, especially where said Land is now solely within one of the already establish Federal States, and, has already been settled, occupied, surveyed and speculated. Pre-Emption = Claim before Pay.
Revised Statutes, FORTY-THIRD CONGRESS 1873-‘74; TITLE XXXII THE PUBLIC LANDS; CHAPTER FOUR SEC. 2257 through SEC. 2288.
This Act Presumes to place most of the Land under the general jurisdiction of MCDC, [MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA] and under the control of the foreign BANCING CARTEL who instructs the President [§2207]. It also only applies to the Specific “citizen of the UNITED STATES”, MCDC[§2259]. It further presumes to limit the amount of land to any claim of a “citizen of the United States”, to that of 1/4 Section, or 160 Acres [§2259]. But a Citizen of a State could acquire what ever amount necessary for His one and only Demesne Manor, His “Domicile”, but only One and in Only One State, or a territory[§2262]. The Price for this minimum amount is in certified Specie Coin of the Realm, and still is only enough to cover the cost of the Survey [§2237et seq.]. He, the Claimant, must also Declare that He will not speculate the Land. Wow, the last principal is out The Window!! [figuratively speaking]
So, here is the chain of events leading up to and including all the Land in these Several States, from the Revolution, to the present residential property tax assessor and non-redeemable banc inflated paper.
Page 62 of 95
First Principal Established by the Revolution 1776:
“Allodial Title to all Land is in the People “White European Citizens in the several States”.”
“Title” __Exclusive Possession; (Noah 1828) Parallel to Right, Unalienable and A Prerogative: __In the United States of America, the highest Human Title ___is a “__Citizen of the State” 2 Dall @455; followed by the Union of _Citizens ___which is the ___State; followed by the highest Title to Land within the State which is “Allodial”, and then Demain, or Demesne Manor, the Personal, Private Abode, Domicile and Castle of the Sovereign, all of which are ‘Secured’ by God and the “Constitution of the United States of America (1788)”; as confirmed by the Revolution of 1776 and Miranda vs. Arizona 384 U.S. @ 491 (1965).
“Allodial” __Pertaining to allodium; freehold; free of rent or service; held independent of a lord paramount; opposed to feudal. Blackstone. Freehold Estate; land which is the absolute property of the owner; real estate held in absolute independence, without being subject to any rent, service, or acknowledgment to a superior. __In the United States of America, Most Lands are Allodial. Noah (1828). In the United States of America ___the Right to hold this Allodial Title to the Private Land in one of the Several Federal States of the American Union is the Prerogative of the ___White People of the United States of America ___as a qualified “__Citizen of the State of His or Her Domicile”, which then is equal to the “Crown Land” in Europe defined as Demesne or Demain by Noah (1828). _Publius
Second Principal Established by the Revolution 1776:
On the other hand, there was a “Land Patent”: THIS _feudal _PHRASE came here before the Revolution, but was a familiar Term with the Founders. But, like the term ”tenants in fee simple” WAS AND IS a
Page 63 of 95
creature of England belonging to the act of the Crown of Europe and its Monarchal system. The term “Land Patent” was exclusively _used by the Crown to identify the highest land title issued under His authority to HIS most loyal _subjects. In the United States of America, the executive authority of both State and Federal Government, have no such preeminence, or Sovereign Prerogative, but by custom and feudal usage, have presumed ___to be the fountain from which this highest _feudal _title to land is issued. They call this title a “Land Patent”. A Land Patent is, like a ___subject, and a creature of the feudal system such as England, where the king is the possessor of all the Land in Allodium, and has the prerogative to issue this Land Patent to a subject of his own choosing, or to void said Patent at his own prerogative. Therefore a _Land Patent _in The United States is nothing more than a sub title that the government has issued under many different treaties or claims to others having no sovereign Prerogatives to the Allodial Title. Said Patent is subject to seizure through a process known as “Eminent Domain”, but only by the final act of 12, White European Citizen Freeholders Domiciled in Their Demain Manor in the State and County of the Patent being seized.
Herein lies the greatest dilemma of Our Time!!! Just what should The “Allodial Title” to Land in one of the Several States claimed adversarialy or by purchase by a White Sovereign State Citizen look Like, and what “Words” of Law should be used to describe It?????
It has already been discovered, that as a matter of Natural Law, the “European People” of these United States of America, with the victory Revolution of 1776, also took on all the Sovereignty and Prerogatives of the Crowns of Europe within Their respective State. Lansing vs. Smith; Scott v. Sanford; Chisholm v. Georgia supra;
The only problem is that they did not assume the Properly worded Title Documents equal to Their newly acquired Sovereign Status. This leads Us to discover the actual Word or combination of Words that is
Page 64 of 95
correct in Law, and Proper to identify the “Title of Land” Actually held by the Crown/King/Princes of Europe as His Private “Domicile”, that does now Lawfully apply to the People?? This leads Us to the term: “Crown Land”.
The Third Principal established by the Revolution 1776:
__“Crown Land” __The demesne lands of the Crown according to Noah 1828; Eng. law. The name given to that portion of the lands of a manor and or Mansion, which the lord retained in his own hands for the use of himself and family. These lands were called terra dominical or demesne lands, because they were occupied by the lord, or dominus manerii, and his servants, &c. 2 Bl.
Com. 90. Vide Ancient Demesne; Demesne as of fee; and Soil assault demesne. Bouvier’s 1856; 1914;
By the Law of Nature, and the Common Law of America, a Citizen of the State, in order to support Himself and His Family of four, more or less, according to the Laws and Principals of Sovereignty, must have access to a piece of Land large enough to enforce His Sovereignty and supply the following elements:
Have a Well, or ___free ___access to Crown Water;
Plant a Garden with Fruit Trees; properly fertilized and maintained according to the Common Law; being disciplined to turn the crop under at least every 7 years;
Have Chickens, and or such other domesticated Animals as He sees fit; And the Land to grow Their Food; also including the Right to fish and take such game as necessary for His ___subsistence ___and that of His Family;
Page 65 of 95
This Land must also be large enough for a leach field or septictank that does not Trespass into a Neighbors Land, or into His own Garden.
A Section, being 1 mile square, was not uncommon, and is in fact a minimum size identified in our Judicial history describing this very Principal.
However you view this chapter on Land, it will be seen as common to the Planet.
The following word has no place in the Demain Title to the Private Property of a White Citizen of the State;
_“Fee” __in Noah(1828) equal to, meaning a “Loan” of Land, an estate in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the grantee on condition of personal service, or other condition…A fee then is any land or tenement held of a superior on certain conditions. It is synonymous with _fief _and _feud . All the land in England, accept the Crown Land, is of this kind.”
Noah did not understand the true nature of a Sovereign People or their Unalienable Rights. All the examples of title to land in all the English Dictionaries refer to definitions of a Feudal relationship between the subjects, as tenants in fee simple, or other fee, and the Crown. All land in Europe is Allodial as applied to the Crown, but feudal as applied to His subjects. A Land Patent owes its existence to this feudal relationship but still is not a Title word to be used to describe the Crown Land in Europe or, the White European Citizen of the State at the Revolution (1776), the Peoples Land in the United States of America.
The Fourth Principal of the Revolution 1776:
“State”: The unanimous consent of the “People” of the colonies, then, [60 U.S. 393, 502] to the power of their sovereign, ‘to dispose of
Page 66 of 95
and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory’ of the Crown, in 1774, was deemed by them as entirely consistent with opposition, remonstrance, the renunciation of allegiance, and proclamation of civil war, in preference to submission to his claim of supreme power in the territories. I pass now to the evidence afforded during the Revolution and Confederation. The American Revolution was ___not ___a social revolution. It did not alter the domestic condition or capacity of persons within the colonies, nor was it designed to disturb the domestic relations existing among them. It was a political revolution, by which thirteen dependent colonies became thirteen independent States. ‘The Declaration of Independence was not,’ says Justice Chase, ‘a declaration that the United Colonies jointly, in a collective capacity, were independent States, &c., & c., &c., but that each of them was a sovereign and independent State; that is, that each of them had a right to govern itself by its own authority and its own laws, without any control from any other power on earth.’ (3 Dall., 199; 4 Cr., 212.) Scott supra @ p.502
The Fifth Principal of the Revolution 1776:
So, From Sovereign in 1776 to SUBJECT in 1866; White European Citizen [first Letter Capitalized] of a Federal, Republican State, United for Their Benefit, Safety, Security, and the Perpetual Existence and Enforcement of Their Sovereignty, and for the Sovereignty of Their Posterity;
Enter the 2nd naturalization law and the term phrase, a “citizen of the UNITED STATES; of Which Our Highest Court of California has declared that; “there is no such thing as “citizen of the UNITED STATES”. See ___Ex parte Frank Knowles ___5 Cal. 300 (1855) ;
Enter the 11th so-called amendment exterminating the Right of a White Sovereign Citizen of a State, to sue a State of White Sovereigns, who, by the fraudulent act of Their executive trustee, violated the most
Page 67 of 95
fundamental American Common Law principal and, the exclusive remedy of and “Action of Assumpsit”, on the obligation and duty of a Federal State, after it consummated a Lawful Contract that helped win the Revolution; See Chisholm supra; and Madison Federalists #43 Sec 8 on “Amendment/Error”;
Enter the “BANK”; Let’s see if WE, THE BANCER MONEY CHANGERS, can con these “White European Sovereigns” into giving US all Their gold and silver in exchange for short term paper redeemable in nothing; And, Their land for worthless “PROMISSORY NOTES” and DEEDS OF TRUST; And, Their Sovereign State Citizenship for a “BANC CARD” and SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT; And, Their Posterity in exchange for a “BIRTH CERTIFICATE” on “BANC NOTE BOND PAPER”, All, without a single shot being fired!!! It’s not rocket science, but it is a consequence of, FRAUDULENT, TREASONABLE ACTS against The White People.
Enter the “CIVIL WAR”; where more White Sovereign State Citizens were exterminated by their own fellow Sovereign Citizens, than any other war until Vietnam; and in the process, by all the legislation of a corrupt alien BANC system, shot Lincoln, and completely converted all the White Sovereign State Citizens into the very status of a “subject freedman” that the CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS supposedly released from The bondage of their White Masters by the “FREEDMANS BUREAU BILL”; also including the unconstitutional 13th , 14th , 15th and ALL THE FOLLOWING SO-CALLED fraudulent AMENDMENT’s TO THE “White European State Citizens Federal Constitution (1788/91)”;
Enter the Reconstruction Period 1866 to present; With the elimination of all reference to “Citizen of the State”, by and through the intent of that FACTION OF BANC CRIMINALS, they enacted a flood of CODES, CIVIL, CRIMINAL, COMMERCIAL &cccccccccccc.. In place of Our American Common Law, vesting their BAR ASSOCIATION with
Page 68 of 95
exclusive right and knobble titles (esquire) and CIVIL CODE POWER to finish the job;
Enter all the words and phrases now unquestionably accepted by the White Posterity, that will, if unchallenged, end the reign of a limited government controlled only by the Sovereignty, Knowledge and Wisdom of the Founding Fathers. Publius
_______________________________________
Chapter 6………. Their GOVERNMENT and its PROPERTY
Their GOVERNMENT and it’s PROPERTY
“PEOPLE/PERSON”, [CORPORATION] in all UPPER CASE, is neither a “noun” or a “Proper Noun”. IT designates an ARTIFICIAL ENTITY of non organic substance. Its common use is found in ITS CHARTER with the general identification of “A CORPORATION”. CORPORATIONS are “CREATURES OF THE STATE”. ITS OFFICERS act according to its CHARTER and not otherwise. See ___Hale vs. Henkel ___201 U.S. 43,74 (1906);
It follows that the 14th SO-CALLED AMENDMENT TO THE US CONSTITUTION consummated the earlier established creation of an artificial citizen, commonly known as a “citizen of the UNITED STATES”, which by a decision from the California State Supreme Court entitled Ex Parte Frank Knowles ___5 Cal 300 (1855) previously cited, the Court, after examining the true nature of Our Republic, and the actual wording used by the Founders in the 1st Naturalization Law, stated that: __“There is no such thing as a citizen of the United States”._
For further personal examples inspect all the government issued DOCUMENTS with Your all UPPER CASE NAME on it. They are,
Page 69 of 95
without exception, ALL in ALL UPPER CASE LETTERS. Don’t forget Your:
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX assessment;
NATURALIZATION CERTIFICATE
WATER AND POWER BILL;
BANC/K RECORDS;
BIRTH CERTIFICATE on BANK NOTE BOND PAPER
SOCIAL SECURITY CARD;
DRIVERS LICENSE;
INSURANCE CARD;
INS GREEN CARD,
VOTER REGISTRATION;
DEATH CERTIFICATE…………………………….
and see the Red box below; all of which in fact identifies You, whether White, Black, Yellow or Red, Law People __“Citizen of the State__” or otherwise, as NOTHING MORE than a “ LEGAL COMMERCIAL ARTIFICIAL FICTITIOUS PERSON” created and MORTGAGED by Our State and Federal Trustees, to A FOREIGN PRIVATE BANC. Still another act of Treason by THE Trustees.
This FOREIGN BANK, by way of carefully infiltrated directorates, and the general ongoing Ignorance of the “White People”, continue to allow these treasonous acts that also converted each of the Federal, Republican States, into “TAXING DISTRICTS”, BY another fraudulent EXECUITIVE ORDER CALLED , “THE ZIP CODE”, and by the unconscious permission of the IGNORANT “White Posterity of the People” of “The United States of America”. You are, by the nature of Your Identification, AND unchallenged use of the worthless fiat paper money you carry, a “CORPORATION”, “ARTIFICIAL COMMERCIAL PERSON” BANC CHATTEL, and the PROPERTY OF THE “PRIVATE” FEDERAL RESERVE BANC; and , the FEDERAL RESERVE is not the
Page 70 of 95
PROPERTY of Our Federal Government, but is, in fact, the Property of PRIVATE STOCK HOLDERS. See Bretton Woods Agreement. Those individuals in Our Government who allowed this attack upon our economic foundation, has committed “Treason” at the highest level against the People and Our Sovereignty. These acts of Treason continue today by those individual trustees who have taken an oath to uphold and defend Our Constitution, but instead continue to take part in the enforcement of fraudulent treasonous foreclosures, treasonous jailing of patriots for protesting, THEIR FRAUDULENT ACTS, and a list to long to mention here. They are adhering to Our ENEMIES, giving them Aid and Comfort. This is American Common Law Treason.
The following includes, but is not limited to a list of THE specific words and phrases defined and used by the BANC system which is foreign to the “Private Rights of the People” and Their American Common Law Constitutions. These WORDS AND PHRASES have been used to identify the foreign subjects, the foreign jurisdictions, and the COMMERCIAL power enforced by the many LEGAL agencies over the subjects of each word or phrase;
MOST THINGS, WORDS, PHRASES, AND PLACES FOUND IN __THE CROWNS __BOX
The act of “BANCING”; have a“BANC ACCOUNT”; live in “THE UNITED STATES” (D.C.) March 26, 1790”; are a citizen identified in “THE 2ND NATURALIZATION ACT January 29, 1795, Stat II Chap. XX, Section 1.”; have a “LAND PATENT’; are a “citizen of the UNITED STATES”; “EMPLOYE OF D.C.”; a “TAXPAYER” (1862) SEE 26 USC § 6331(a); claim your rights under the “CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS” 1866; are a “CIVILIAN” (subject to the ROMAN CIVIL LAW); have a “MARRIAGE LICENSE” (1868) (inter marriage); are an “EMPLOYE” (Bouvier’s page 589, (1890); “The FEDERAL RESERVE ACT” (1913);
Page 71 of 95
The “STOCK MARKET”; a “BIRTH or DEATH CERTIFICATE” on BANK NOTE PAPER; the “PEOPLE” mortgaged by “HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 192 June 5, 1933”; “The People” become “BANKERS” by creating BANC “PROMISSORY NOTES”; signing a “BANK SIGNATURE CARD”; acceptance of “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES” 1934; “BORROWER, DEBTOR”; FTB 540“resident”; “RESIDENT of the STATE”; “TENANTS IN FEE SIMPLE”; “person”;“ subject to All the AMENDMENTS To the Constitution of the United States of America, starting with the so-called 11th amendment on”; use of TITLE 42 § 1983; NAME IN “ALL UPPER CASE”; subject to “MOTOR VEHICLE CODE”; “DRIVER’s LICENSE”; “operator of MOTOR VEHICLE (1925); “MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION AND PINK SLIP”; “RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX”, “ INCOME TAX”;“SOCIAL SECURITY” 1935; live in a “ZONING IMPROVEMENT PLAN ZIPCode”26USC §7621 TAXING DISTRICT; “OBAMA CARE”; 28 U.S.C. CODE RULE 1 THROUGH 81 combining law and equity; “THE PATRIOT ACT”; & c…….
If you find yourself identified by any one of the subjects, living in the geographies, in agreement with the titles, or names, or have signed any one or more of the applications, or used any one or more as your authority to exercise a privilege in this box, your private property, Personalty, is, and you have agreed to be and are, the owned subject of a foreign power, well known to the Founding Fathers. These things and others in their likeness are the very cause that brought about the creation and enforcement of the “Magna Charta”, and the “Revolution and Declaration of Independence on July 4, of 1776, and all the other Sources of Our White Sovereign Liberties!!! Publius
End of Box
These words and others have been used by the money changers,
THROUGH A GENERALLY ACCEPTED PRACTICE OF SILENT
FRAUD, to transform the __White_People and ‘Their Posterity ___back into the
Page 72 of 95
very thing that the Founding Fathers fought and died to free themselves and their Posterity from. Simply stated, SUBJECTS of the Crown, and the live stock of a “Cestui Que Trust” under the Pope, dating back to the 1300s and the time of “Magna Charta”:
ENTER THE WORDS, AND PHRASES; CIVIL, CIVIL LAW, CIVIL CODE, CIVILIAN:
These words emanate from a time controlled by EMPERORS AND TYRANTS. The most noted being JUSTINIAN. Hence the word “Justice” or “Equality” or “EQUITY” or “contract”.
CIVIL LAW and its variations, emanated from the writings of the subject underlings of the EMPEROR JUSTINIAN, which writings were founded upon the EMPEROR, and the roman citizens subject status, but, which has no authority or Principal what so ever over the American Common Law Rights of “We The White People” so long as We do not engage the Public At Large. This CODE SYSTEM was completely unknown to the Principles of Our Republican Form of Government. A search of all The Sources of Our Liberties, will show the complete lack of such a CODE used as authoritative reference by any of Our Founders, in Their Revolutionary Act of establishing the Sovereignty and the Private Prerogatives of “We The White People”; Or, for the enforcement by Our Founders to, of, or from the “ROMAN CIVIL LAW”.
Our ___Republican Form of Government ___was Secured by the Federalists and was founded upon Our God Given Unalienable Rights, not by any dictate of man or his “civil codes”. The child of 3 is no more equal in common sense to a common law adult of 12, who, is, in comparison, not equal to a civil code adult of 18, who, is not equal to a Common Law Citizen of a State at the sovereign age of 25. In Our American Common Law, equality is an attribute of the highest example of the Righteous Law, it’s Our execution of self, as a Vehicle for God by each of Us upon Our fellow Man.
Page 73 of 95
But, enter the CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS (1866) (anti slavery) applying only to the black slaves, now “freedmen”; and for the sake of repetition and redundancy; now takes on the attributes of a Monarchal Democracy.
The term “civil law” appears but twice in the “Federalists Papers”, first in Hamilton №81 p. 488, but is used expressively only to distinguish a “civil-law mode of trial”, as opposed to and distinguished from “criminal trial”, but no mention or reference was ever made to any writing or other rule identified as a “CIVIL CODE”; Second, in Hamilton 83, it appears as “proceeds in general either according to the course of the canon or civil law, without the aid of a jury.” Again, its reference is to a feudal system, but without reference to any “CIVIL CODE” from Our Founding White Federalists Fathers.
__Since its creation, The phrase “THE UNITED STATES”, __has been enlarged and used as silent Fraud, to identify and define more things than can reasonably be calculated; and in fact has been given several different meanings by the Supreme Court: From at least (1790), just following the 1st Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790. This phrase ‘UNITED STATES’ has been used to include but not limited to identify some of the following:
‘THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA’, which is by Law and Principal, the MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Of, By and For the White European Citizens of a State United, who in their Sovereign capacity established to the World, a Trust that in Law and Principal is its CHARTER, and which created and became the Peoples CORPORATION, improperly named, “THE UNITED STATES” by Act of July 16, 1790;
Our miss guided, carrot following Trustees have become the bullies on the Block called Earth, and by and through their coalition of tyrants have used its CORPORATE NAME “THE UNITED STATE”, to enforce its CORPORATE JURISDICTION, and seize other “PROPERTY HOLDINGS” OVER ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING that does not
Page 74 of 95
have the Wisdom, or THE Power to repel its onslaught; such things and places include but are not limited to the following:
NATIONAL PARKS; Demesne Manors of the People ‘PORTO RICO’ Ceded to the United States On September 29, 1898 (Treaty of Peace); also including ‘GUAM’; ‘AMERICAN SAMOA’; and the ‘VIRGIN ISLANDS’; and By Article I§8, Cl 17, US Constitution: all ‘US FORTs and US ARSENALS’; ‘US MAGAZINES’; all ‘US DISTRICT COURTS’ and ‘The District Court of the United States’; And by Article IV§3, Cl. 2; THE 3 TO 12 MILE LIMIT OFF SHORE; the Boundary Lines separating the 50 States from each other and the adjoining Sovereign Nations; US citizens, domestic or abroad; EVEN A US BATTLESHIP CRUISING IN FOREIGN WATERS; and a ‘US EMBASSY’ ON FOREIGN SOIL. THIS PHRASE has also been used throughout the 50 U.S. CODES to define AND ENFORCE its “COMMERCIAL/ADMIRALTY/ and MARITIME” jurisdictions within and OVER some one or All of the Several 50 States of the American Union. See ___Hooven vs.Evatt ___324 U.S. 652,671,672 (1944); Also see TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE §§ 5, & 7; just to name just a few.
However, for the clarification of all you ignorant civil war type rebels who have taken part in the unauthorized acts of rebellion against the corporate UNITED STATES because of its far overreaching Land acquisitions in Your State, you might take a careful look at the following Supreme Court case: in .___Collins vs. Yosemite Park Co. ___304 U.S. 518,530 (1938); whatever the general power and jurisdiction of the UNITED STATES might be, in the act of acquiring property, and to exercise its jurisdiction over a NATIONAL PARK, THIS Court fails to see any evidence of a constitutionally authorized Fort, Arsenal, or other needful building that is or will be constructed on or in the Park giving the US total jurisdiction over the entire Park. It is not clear from the claim of the United State just how It has manage to acquired possession and control over this Park solely within the exterior boundary of that State, but it did not come
Page 75 of 95
within the operation of Article I § 8, Cl 17; and it is evident that unless a US fort, arsenal, or other needful building can be found there, it follows by the prohibitions of the constitution on this subject, that this, or any other Park of like kind, does not belong to the US, but, in fact of Law, belongs to the White Citizens of This State and not otherwise. This overreaching jurisdiction is just another ploy, exercised by the BANC To take back the People, and Their Land, and exterminate this Annoying experiment of the Sovereign People, and reestablish the ultimate, and unlimited Royal Crown jurisdiction over the Planet.
In relation to the rights and property of our Government, the following must be considered;
“Inalienable” . According to Noah (1828)..the dominions of the king are inalienable; by this principal, The title to the Lands of the Crown of England are “Allodial” and held by military force and have not been transferred to a subject accept by Royal Grant, or be taken by the king of Spain accept by war. The Unalienable Rights exercised by Americans are of God and intended to be exercised and shared by all The People, all countries and all faiths and all races. These Rights are alienable as applied to the Kings power who can do what ever he wishes as long as his subjects are happy. There rights are only privileges that emanate from the Crown as they have no concept of Unalienable; On the other hand, under Our Republican form of Government, the Citizen of the State is not the fountain of Rights which flow from God the Creator, but the vehicle for the passing on The Wisdom and Sovereignty. The Citizen, by the Preamble to Our Federal Constitution, has the Duty and Obligation to teach this Principal to the Posterity, in order that these Unalienable Rights continue to be enforceable and perpetual. Publius
We now come to the specific Words and Phrases used by the Founding Federalists to establish the most People Friendly Government, following the consummated Act of Rebellion1776:
Page 76 of 95
“Federal” /”Federated”/”Confederated” In The United States of America, as the Constitution of the United States of America; Confederated __and United in a __League __as in the United States of America, Leagued between Princes or States; To Unite as Princes or States; a Union of Princes or “Citizens of the State” in “The United States of America”; a Federal Union of Federal States, composed of White Citizens of each of the Federal States; see Noah Webster (1828) Article IV Section 4 states: “The __Federal ___United States of America shall guarantee to every State of this Union a __“Republican Form of Government”. ___As Opposed to a “__DEMOCRACY”;…
The following quote is an actual quote from the WWII Training Manual, that was used as a propaganda machine to convince another large number of a combination of both State and US Citizens and citizens to give their life for a foreign BANC. UNDERLINE, HIGHLIGHT and some corrected Capitalization added for proper emphasis:
The following is taken from the TRAINING MANUAL} WAR DEPARTMENT №2000–25} WASHINGTON, November 30, 1928. CITIZENSHIP Prepared under direction of the Chief of Staff. This manual supersedes Manual of Citizenship Training. The use of the publication “The Constitution of the United States,” by Harry Atwood, is by permission and courtesy of the author. The source of other references is shown in the bibliography.
- Comparative analysis. — The following comparative analysis shows the Principal Characteristics of the three forms of government: _Autocracy: ___Authority is derived through heredity. People have no choice in the selection of their rulers and no voice in making of the laws. Results in __arbitrariness, tyranny, and oppression. Attitude toward
Page 77 of 95
property is feudalistic. Attitude toward law is that the will of the ruler shall control, regardless of reason or consequences.
Democracy: __A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of “direct” expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is __communistic — negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagoguism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Republic: __Authority is derived through the election by the __People ___of public officials best fitted to represent ___Them. Attitude toward Property is respect for laws and Individual Rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward Law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles ___and established evidence, with a strict regard to ___consequences. A greater number of Citizens ___and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either __tyranny or mobocracy__. Results in Statesmanship, Liberty, Reason, Justice, Contentment, and Progress. Is the “standard form” of government throughout the World. A Republic is a form of government under a Constitution which provides for the election of (1) an Executive and (2) a Legislative body, who working together in a Representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation, all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create (3) a Judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize (4) ___certain inherent Individual Rights.
Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy. — Atwood.
- Superior to all others. — Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
Democracy is the “direct” rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success.
Page 78 of 95
Our Constitutional Fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with ___fixed principles ___definitely in mind, defined a representative Republican Form of Government. They “made a very marked distinction between a ___Republic ___and a __democracy __* * * and said repeatedly and Emphatically that They had founded a Republic.”
Madison, in the Federalist, emphasized the fact that this government was a Republic ___and not a __democracy, the Constitution makers having considered both an autocracy and a democracy as undesirable forms of government while “a ___Republic __* * * promises the cure for which we are seeking.” In a democracy the _people __meet and exercise the government in person. In a ___Republic ___They assemble and administer it by Their respective agents. — _Madison.
The advantage which a Republic has over a democracy consists in the substitution of representatives whose enlightened views and virtuous sentiments render them superior to local prejudices and to schemes of injustice. — Madison.
The American form of government ___is the oldest republican form of government in the world, and is exercising a pronounced influence in modifying the governments of other nations. ___Our Constitution has been copied in whole or in part throughout the earth.
-
No direct action. — Under the representative form of government there is no place for “direct action.” The inherent characteristic of a republic is government by representation. The people are permitted to do only two things; they may vote once every four years for the executive and once in two years for members of the legislative body. [They also have the Right and Power to try and hang traitors; Publius]
-
Methods of representative government. — Constitutional government may be set up under either a written or an unwritten Constitution.
An unwritten constitution. — An unwritten constitution consists largely of customs, precedents, conditions, and understandings, and is
Page 79 of 95
constantly changing; any party in power may enact legislation materially affecting the methods of government and the political rights of citizens.
A written constitution. — In the United States the Rights of the [White] People are fully protected and the functions of government strictly defined in a written document — the Constitution. It is called a “rigid Constitution” because the legislative power has no authority to change it.
It is subject to amendment only by the authority and action of the people through their representatives in Congress. [But only when a deviation from the Truth and the Founders intent is discovered; Publius]
The Congress, whenever two-thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three-fourths thereof, as one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided * * * that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate. — Constitution, Article V. __[Accept where that amendment violates the Unalienable Rights and or Sovereignty of the White State Citizen; Publius]
Since the adoption of the Constitution our Nation has increased in population from 3,000,000 to more than 125,000,000 and has developed from a wilderness to the greatest industrial nation in the world. The adequacy of our Constitution is evidenced by the adoption of only 19 amendments to modify the principles set forth in the original document. [now XXVI acts of Treason]
As a wall of protection our written Constitution stands between the [White] people and those who, through lust for power, or the temporary passions of the moment, or for any other reason, would trespass upon the rights of person or property.
Page 80 of 95
- Consent of the governed. — The original desire of the colonists was “only to have a voice” in the affairs of the Government. Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed * * *. We have petitioned for Redress in the most bumble terras: Our repented Petitions have been answered only by repeated tyranny. — Declaration of Independence.
The situation so developed that the colonists totally dissolved “all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain,” and established a new form of government based upon the “consent of the governed.” “Consent” in the drafting and approval of the instrument of government and its subsequent amendment was a new feature.
- “American Bill of Rights.” — When the Constitutional Convention was drawing to a close several members who opposed the adoption of the Constitution suggested a number of amendments, which, they declared, “would make the Constitution acceptable to them.”
While the Constitution already contained many provisions for the protection of the rights of the individual citizen, various States desired that it contain further written stipulations that would remove every possibility of doubt and prevent disputes by “leaving no matters to inference, implication, or construction.”
It was contended that the provision of the suggested Bill of Rights contained “various exceptions not granted * * *. Why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?”
The tyranny of legislature is a most formidable dread at present, and will be for many years. That of the Executive will come in its time, but it will be at a remote period. — Madison.
Subsequently, many of these features were incorporated in the first 10 amendments, adopted in 1791 as supplements to the Constitution, and are called the “American Bill of Rights.”
The first 10 amendments embodied “guaranties and immunities which are inherited from our English ancestors.” — Supreme Court (1897).
Page 81 of 95
- Enumeration of constitutional rights. — Individual rights formally guarded _by _original constitutional provisions:
No ex-post facto laws.
No bill of attainder.
No suspension of privileges of habeas corpus.
Trial by jury and at places where the crimes were committed.
Definition of treason and limiting punishment.
Guaranty of immunity and privileges of all States to the citizens of each State.
No religious test before admission to public office.
To which the Bill of Rights added:
Right of peaceable assembly and petition to the Government for redress of grievances.
Freedom of religion, speech, and press.
Right of the people to keep and bear arms — militia.
Quartering of soldiers only as provided by law.
Protection against unreasonable searches.
Right of accused to indictment by grand jury with certain exceptions.
No compulsory testimony against self.
No deprivation of rights without due process of law.
No confiscation of private property for public use without just compensation.
Right of a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury.
Right to demand information concerning the nature and cause of accusation.
To be confronted with witnesses against him.
Compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.
Have assistance of counsel for defense.
Right of trial by jury in suits of common law where value and controversy shall exceed $20.
Protection of verdict of said jury.
No excessive bail required.
No imposition of excessive fines.
No infliction of cruel and unusual punishment.
Rights retained by the people shall not be denied nor disparaged.
Page 82 of 95
Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States are reserved to the States or to the people. [Right to receive gold and silver Coin in payment of Debt; Article I §10 C. 1Publius]
- Government by representation. — The framers of the Constitution were opposed to direct government. The remedy sought was to be found in representative government. Madison declared that the object to which their efforts wore to be directed was how to prevent a majority rule and to preserve the spirit and form of popular government. The representative form of government was their answer.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a republican form of government. — Constitution, Article IV, Sect. 4 _Sovereignty was placed in the hands of the _People. No authority was delegated to any department either of National or State Government except by the ___People ___through the provisions contained in the Constitution.
There could be no question but that by a republican form of government was intended a government in which not only would the people’s ___representatives make laws and the agents administer them, but the ___people ___would also directly or indirectly choose the Executive. — _Cooley._” ___WWII training manual Supra.
It must be stated here that although the preceding manual comprehends many of the necessary principles or Our Federal Union, it tends to Error when stating the Principal of the “Amendment” section of the Constitution and instead, created the presumption that Our Constitution could, or has been “modified” for the benefit of the People??? This statement could not be further from the Truth. I will now paraphrase a quote from the Supreme Court in ___United Mine Workers v. US ___330 U.S. 258 (1947, Footnote 23; where it address the use of common words like “person, when applied to “The Sovereign”:
“The most general words that can be devised (for example, any person or persons, bodies politic or corporate) affect not him (the
Page 83 of 95
sovereign) in the least if they may tend to restrain or diminish any of his rights or interests.”
Dollar Savings Bank v. United States, 19 Wall. 227, 86 U. S. 239 (1873).
The Unalienable Rights and Prerogatives of the Sovereign White Citizen of the State established at the Revolution of 1776, have been replaced with COMMERCIAL AND CIVIL CODES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS, enacted in the years following the CIVIL WAR AND RECONSTRUCTION 1866 through Present day, that by their enforcement by the present treasonous administration, has restrained and in fact eliminated and replaced all the Prerogatives, Sovereignty and State Citizenship of the White People, and in Their place stand GOVERNMENT ENACTED CIVIL RIGHTS. CIVIL PENAL COMMERCIAL AND POLITICAL CODES. Publius
In this present Day the fiat financial monarchy, having no Constitutional Foundation, through __“_erroneous” ___legislation, both state and united states, has presumed and acquired the Sovereignty over the “White Citizen and His Exempt Personalty [see ___Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust ___157 U.S. 429,634(1894)]. The Sovereign White People have been unrecognizably blended into all the other subject classes of people becoming general “taxpaying resident aliens” subject to the general commercial jurisdiction of the corporate state and THE corporate united states. Publius
“Republic” In the United States of America __“a State in which the exercise of the political sovereign power is enforced exclusively by the Constitutionally qualified Elected representatives of and by the __People ___as “__White Citizens of the State”; but as _Elected Trustees, this power is “Delegated”, not presumed, and is expressly limited to the Principal and actual ___Intent ___of the ___Founders ___as meticulously worded by Them in the limited Articles of the Constitution and not otherwise; See Article X of Amendment (1791) that states: “The Powers not delegated to the United
Page 84 of 95
States by the Constitution, nor Prohibited ___by it to the States are reserved To the States respectively, or to the ___People.” Publius
“It has been several times truly remarked that bills of rights are, in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgements of prerogative ___in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was MAGNA CARTA, obtained by the barons, sword in hand, from King John. Such were the subsequent confirmations of that Charter by succeeding princes. Such was the PETITION OF RIGHT assented to by Charles I., in the beginning of his reign. Such, also, was the Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of parliament called the Bill of Rights. [Keep in Mind that all those Claims of Liberty were demands of the White European People against Their Sovereign Prince.] It is evident, therefore, that, according to their primitive signification, they had no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the Power of the People, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. ___Here, in The United States of America, in strictness, the White European People surrender nothing; and as They retain “Everything”, They have no need of particular Reservations. ___``We, The People of the United States, to secure the Blessings of Liberty to Ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.’’ ___Here is a better recognition of popular rights, than Volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our State bills of Rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government [OR a Dictionary]. But a minute detail of particular Rights is certainly far less applicable to a Constitution like that under consideration, which is merely intended to regulate the general political interests of the Nation, than to a constitution which has the regulation of every species of personal and ___private ___concerns. …..This Country and this People seem to have been Made for Each Other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest
Page 85 of 95
ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties. Similar sentiments have hitherto prevailed among all orders and denominations of men among us. To all general purposes We have uniformly been one People each individual Citizen everywhere enjoying the same national Rights, Privileges, and Protection. As a Nation We have made Peace and War; as a Nation We have vanquished Our common enemies; as a Nation We have formed Alliances, and made Treaties, and entered into various Compacts and Conventions with foreign States.
A Strong sense of the Value and Blessings of Union induced the People, at a very early period, to institute a Federal Government to Preserve and Perpetuate it. They formed it almost as soon as They had a Political existence; nay, at a time when Their habitations were in flames, when many of Their Citizens were bleeding, and when the progress of Hostility and Desolation left little room for those Calm and Mature Inquiries and Reflections which must ever precede the Formation of a Wise and well-balanced Government for a Free [White] People. It is not to be wondered at, that a government instituted in times so inauspicious, should on experiment be found greatly deficient and inadequate to the purpose it was intended to answer.
This intelligent People perceived and regretted these defects. Still continuing no less attached to union than enamored of Liberty, They observed the danger which immediately threatened the former and more remotely the latter; and being persuaded that ample Security for Both could only be found in a National Government more wisely Framed, They as with one Voice, convened the late Convention at Philadelphia, to take that important Subject under consideration.
This convention composed of ___Men ___who Possessed the confidence of the People, and many of whom had become highly distinguished by Their Patriotism, Virtue and Wisdom, in times which tried the Minds and Hearts of Men, undertook the arduous Task. In the mild season of Peace, with Minds unoccupied by other subjects, They passed many months in cool, uninterrupted, and daily Consultation; and
Page 86 of 95
finally, without having been awed by Power, or Influenced by any Passions except Love for Their Country, They presented and recommended to the [White] People the plan produced by Their joint and very unanimous Councils. Publius №3 for “The Constitution of the United States of America”.
“Principal”, in a general sense, the cause, source or origin of anything; a general truth; human nature; foundation such as cause and effect; motion or action; leading; more important; chief; a common law; of royal blood; of sovereignty; “In the United States of America: “A White Citizen of the State” Domiciled of His Demesne/Manor/Castle while in the exercise of His/Her Private Unalienable Rights, is the Principal. Publius
Government Property
When the government, either State or Federal or National claims property, Public or Private, real or otherwise, foreign or Domestic, the first Principal of Our Federal System, created and vested by the Power of the White State Citizen through His Trust/Constitution, comes into effect. Their trustees must first cite the specific Article, Section and or Clause of its charter, the Original Constitution, vesting it or them with the specific power and the specific authority to assume jurisdiction over it and acquire it and so state the specific Purpose for its acquisition. This is called “Disclosure” that is the mandatory exposure upon the trustees and all their limited acts to be maintained in clear and unencumbered public view. All acts of the government employees, who volunteer to be the servants of the White People, must remain transparent and visible to its ‘Master Employers’, The White Male Citizens of the State. This open disclosure is not voluntary but Mandatory. Publius
It was stated in Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S.623 (1887) that:
Page 87 of 95
“There are, of necessity, limits beyond which legislation cannot rightfully go. While every possible presumption is to be indulged in favor of the validity of a statute, (Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 718 ,) the courts must obey the constitution rather than the law-making department of government, and must, upon their own responsibility, determine whether, in any particular case, these limits have been passed. ‘To what purpose,’ it was said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137, 167, ‘are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, __and if acts prohibited and acts allowed are of equal obligation.’ The courts are not bound by mere forms, nor are they to be misled by mere pretenses. __They are at liberty, indeed, are under a solemn duty, __to look at the substance of things, whenever they enter upon the inquiry whether the legislature has transcended the limits of its authority. __If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, __or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the constitution. __Mugler @ p. 661.
I must here give a short synopsis on the Word “Duty”, and its relationship to an “Unalienable Right” of the “White Posterity”: as I have previously stated, there is no verbiage, or definitions written or otherwise, in any case law, or legislation on the books in our Federal or State Libraries that specifically vests the power of Private Sovereignty or Private Prerogatives in any class or people other than the “White People”. All the CIVIL CODES, AND CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS, so stated from 1866 to present, acts, or vest only civil right. And, in order that the Sovereignty and Prerogatives’ shall be restored, we must trace their existence to a point of beginning and identify that specific race that they were secured to. As
Page 88 of 95
of this date in time, the only class ever endowed with Sovereignty, Private Unalienable Prerogative Rights are the White People in the Several States of this Federal Union (1776). Publius
It therefore follows that it was, and still is the solemn “Duty” of all Our Trustees to protect and defend the Posterity from any invasion, foreign or domestic, against Our “State Citizenship”, Our Demesne Land and Allodial Titles, Our Gold and Silver Coin, Our Republican Form of Government, and Our Writ of Error; Publius
“Duty”: __As we had occasion to observe in California v. San Pablo & T. R. Co. 149 U.S. 308, 314, 37 S. L. ed. 747, 749, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 876, ‘the __duty __of this court, as of __every __judicial tribunal, is limited to determining __rights __of [179 U.S. 405, 409] persons or of property, which are actually controverted in the particular case before it. When, in determining such __rights, it becomes Necessary to give an opinion upon a question of law, that opinion may have weight as a precedent for future decisions. But the court is not empowered to decide moot questions or abstract propositions, or to declare, for the government of future cases, principles or rules of law which cannot affect the result as to the thing in issue in the case before it. No stipulation of parties, or counsel, whether in the case before the court, or in any other case, can enlarge the power or affect the ___duty __of the court in this regard. ‘__TYLER v. JUDGES OF THE COURT OF REGISTRATION, ___179 U.S. 405,409 (1900)
“Writ of Error”: __“A writ of Error is a writ of Right which is grantable __ex debito justitiæ; . . . It is the constitutional right of every citizen to have his case reviewed in one form or another by a court of error:. A suit at law can be reviewed only on writ of error; . .; Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, (1914) p. 210. For reference, it was the direct result of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS (1866) that unleashed a hoard of miss guided black people to begin their arduous task of assimilating themselves into a sovereignty that did not recognize them. And by their plight began to
Page 89 of 95
move their court actions via the “Writ of Error”. Because this Writ was mandatory upon the Supreme Court, it was inundated beyond control with a number of Writs of Error beyond its capacity to hear. This prompted the legislature to intervene and vest the Supreme Court with power to determine whether the case before it qualified in all respects under the principal of a Writ of Error. But instead of the court distinguishing those cases of civil rights and distinguishing them from Unalienable Rights and Allodial Titles under the American Common Law, the miss guided Court of Error simply decided to ignore this Writ of Error, and miss quote the act of Congress that did not abolish the Writ of Error but instructed that court to distinguish between Error and Appeal/Certiorari.
Wherefore, when any attack upon the Security of the Rights and Titles vested in the Sovereign White People Citizens of the State and Secured by the Constitution are involved, it is the Duty __of the Legislature, the Executive and the Courts to protect and defend the Unalienable Rights of the White Citizen; and, the Writ of Error which are all synonymous terms; accept that the “Writ of Error, Like the Allodial Titles to Land, Like the Private Unalienable Prerogative Rights of Life, Liberty and Private Property, and last but not least the “White Citizen of the State” have all been erroneously and Treasonously eliminated from Our Republican Federal System by acts of the Legislatures purporting to be Lawful, but in fact and Principal have all but destroyed the People, Their Rights, their Sovereign Status, and The Posterity, from which I now Stand. __Publius
“Title” __Exclusive Possession; (Noah 1828) Parallel to Right, Unalienable and Prerogative: __In the United States of America, the highest human Title ___is a “__Citizen of the State” 2 Dall @455; followed by the Union of _Citizens ___which is the ___State; followed by the highest Title ___to ___Land ___within the ___State ___which is “__Allodial” Demesne/Demain Manor/Castle, all of which are ‘Secured’ by God and the _“Constitution of the United States of America (1788)”; as confirmed in ___Miranda vs. Az ___384 U.S. @ 491(1965).
Page 90 of 95
By this Principals of Our Government, all Our Trustees under Oath, State and Federal, Elected or appointed, and their Agents, owe their political existence to the Will of the White European State Citizens; and by this fact of Law, there is no Real Property that is exclusive to these Trustees accept for the express purpose of its use to enforce Our American Common Law throughout the several States, and to be an Example of Truth to the World; But, when in the course of human events it becomes necessary for this White European People to throw off the CHAINS OF OPPRESSION, and neutralize the many Frauds and acts of Treason committed against them and Their Sovereignty; the trustees of Their Government will be charged and held accountable; and, because the People are the final Repository of all the Power, all the Land, and all its Fruits, and when this People decide that this government has exceeded its power and authority, and conspired to exterminate Them as the People, They are at Will, and have a Duty to The Posterity, by and under the God given Grant of Sovereignty, been vested with the power to exterminate those Insidious, Treasonous individuals, and there hold on the Land they operate from.
In Repetition:
__“Allodial” __Pertaining to allodium; freehold; free of rent or service; held independent of a lord paramount; opposed to feudal. Blackstone.
Freehold Estate; land which is the absolute property of the owner; real estate held in absolute independence, without being subject to any rent, service, or acknowledgment to a superior. In the United States of America, Most Lands are Allodial. Noah (1828). In the United States of America ___the Right to hold this Allodial Title to the Private Land in one of the Several Federal States of the American Union is the Prerogative of the ___White People of the United States of America ___as a qualified “__Citizen of the State of His or Her Demesne Domicile_”, which then is equal to the
Page 91 of 95
“Crown Land” in Europe as Demesne or Demain. But does not apply to any land in use by Our Government. Publius
So, even the terms of, a “Land Patent” does not apply to GOVERNMENT held land: THIS feudal _PHRASE came here with the Founders, but like the term ”tenants in fee simple” is a creature of the _Crown of England, _used to identify the highest land title issued by the Crown to one of his _subjects. In the United States of America, the executive authority of both State and Federal Government, have ___presumed ___to be the fountain from which this highest _feudal _title to land is issued.
They call this title a “Land Patent”. A Land Patent is, like a subject, a creature of a feudal system such as England, where the king is the possessor of all the Land in Allodium, and has the ultimate prerogative to issue this Land Patent to a subject of his own choosing, or to void said Patent at his own prerogative. Therefore a _Land Patent _in The United States is nothing more than a sub title that the government has issued under many different treaties or claims to others having no sovereign Prerogatives to the Allodial Title OF Our “Crown Land”.
But in the United States of America, even this once acquired Land Patent has been hidden and replaced with things like “DEED” or “TRUST DEED”; or, “TAX DEED”, or “RESIDENTIAL TAXABLE PROPERTY”, and subject to a “RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX ASSESSOR”; among others.
In repetition:
Herein We find the second greatest dilemma of Our Time!!! Just what should the title to the Land assigned under Articles I and IV of the Constitution to the Federal Governments look Like, and what “Words” in Law, properly describe It?????
Page 92 of 95
Because the Constitution is, by its Principal and Application, a “Trust”; Hamilton №65; which sole purpose is to Secure the Unalienable Rights to the White People and Their Posterity, it then follows that the Peoples Elected agents under that Trust are, “Trustees”, [Madison, Federalist №46] then and all the Land held in Trust or assigned from that Trust under authority of the White People to the agencies for express purposes under the Trust, are, “Trust Land”; So, How about “Trust Land of the White Citizens of the several States”!!!
And subject to Their Sovereign Jurisdiction.
Madison continued; “The federal and State governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers, and designed for different purposes. The adversaries of the Constitution seem to have lost sight of the people altogether in their reasoning’s on this subject; and to have viewed these different establishments, not only as mutual rivals and enemies, but as uncontrolled by any common superior in their efforts to usurp the authorities of each other. These gentlemen must here be reminded of their error. They must be told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone, and that it will not depend merely on the comparative ambition or address of the different governments, whether either, or which of them, will be able to enlarge its sphere of jurisdiction at the expense of the other. Truth, no less than decency, requires that the event in every case should be supposed to depend on the sentiments and sanction of their common constituents. Many considerations, besides those suggested on a former occasion, seem to place it beyond doubt that the first and most natural attachment of the people will be to the governments of their respective States.”
Page 93 of 95
Treason…. I now ask these 7 questions in order for you, as a “Trustee”, to determine whether the Sovereignty that I was Secured by the Constitution at My Birth, is still in full force and effect??? And if My Sovereignty is not, whether someone has and still is committing Treason against My Sovereignty as one of the Posterity, and all the White People and those of you non whites who claim equal status!!!!!!
What would the sheriff or police do in California, if they saw My Private Automobile sitting or moving on public property without a MOTOR VEHICLE license, MOTOR VEHICLE registration or MOTOR VEHICLE insurance???
What would a sheriff or police in California do if he/she saw Me carrying an unconcealed firearm/weapon on Public Property???
What would the IRS or FTB do if I didn’t pay an assessed tax on money they discovered I received for Completion of an Article I §10 private contract???
What would the courts do when a foreign private banc foreclosed on My Private Property for not making mortgage payments with unconstitutional money???
What would Homeland security do if I tried to pass the airport check point with undeclared 10k frn’s or that amount in US gold and silver Coins or both???
What would the CA FTB tax authority do if I didn’t pay a “residential property tax” on my Private Demain Manor/Domicile???
What would the Governor/Secretary of the STATE OF CLIFORNIA do if I demanded the issuance of a Lawful Identification for My “State Citizenship”; “Exempt Plates” and “Manufactures Certificate of Origin” for My all My Private Conveyance’s; A Certificate of Allodial Title and Exemption from Property Tax to My Private Real Property (Demain Manor/Domicile Castle)???
Page 94 of 95
I WOULD, most assuredly BE BRANDED AS A PATRIOT TYPE, RADICAL EXTREEMEST, ANARCHEST, TAX PROTESTOR, AND WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE, BUT: it is immanently certain ___that those of YOU who took An Article VI Oath to protect and defend My Constitution who intentionally legislate, execute and judge to deny My Sovereignty My Unalienable Rights and steel My Private Property Secured by that Constitution, are, in the Eyes of God and your Creators, “We The People”, Guilty of “__Treason”!!!_
In order to finalize a principal discounted by bankers, tyrants, dictators, monarchists, and other solists of the human race, I, like the other members of this American Federal Union, was, like the Founding Founders, born a “Federalist”, as this term was understood and emplemented by Them. And as such, I was also endowed by God with certain Unalienable Rights secured by Their Revolt. And by this fact in Our History, I became a member of a Sovereign Class of White State Citizens with the Right of inheritance to all the Rights, Prerogatives Exemptions, both Real and Personal Private Property, My Gold and Silver Coin, and My “Republican Form of Government. In place of these Royal Prerogatives, the Trustees and those of you who conspire with them, have instead:
Replaced, no, Stolen My Rightful Inheritance of Gold and Silver Coin, and in its place have printed enough nonredeemable fiat banc paper to destroy the entire world economy; Denied and hidden My Prerogative Right to a non taxable Demesne Castle, and replaced it with a banc deed taxable residence; Denied Me My Unalienable Rights to Travel in My Exempt Carriage AND replaced it with a STATE owned LICENSABLE, TAXABLE, INSURABLE COMMERCIAL MOTORVEHICLE;
Page 95 of 95
Replaced My Republican Form of Government with a bastardized form of DEMOCRACY/AUTOCRACY; And Exterminated My American Common Law Rights in My Courts;
And Exterminated My Sovereignty and in its place you feed me nothing but government commercial regulations;
All these and more are ongoing Acts of ___“Treason” ___against the White People of the United States of America Let it be said, as before, when the People fail to learn from the Mistakes of Their Past, They, or Their Posterity are “Doomed” to repeat it.
The Beginning….. Publius